Oppo K13 Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy A55: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Champions
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and fast charging, the Oppo K13 Turbo is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8450 chipset offers a significant performance advantage. However, the Samsung Galaxy A55 excels in battery endurance and display brightness, making it a better choice for everyday users who value longevity and outdoor visibility.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K13 Turbo | Samsung Galaxy A55 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 21 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 25 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 77.2 x 7.3 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.29 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A725 & 4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A725) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G720 MC7 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Purple Phantom, Midnight Maverick, White Knight | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | PLM110 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 23,795 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
Oppo K13 Turbo
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8450)
- Ultra-fast 80W wired charging
- Versatile charging protocols (PD, UFCS, PPS)
- Likely superior gaming performance
- Battery life potentially lower than A55
- Display specs currently unknown
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent battery life (13:27h active use)
- Bright and vibrant display (1010 nits)
- Samsung’s established software ecosystem
- Optical Image Stabilization (OIS)
- Slower processor (Exynos 1480)
- Slow 25W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight – a crucial advantage for outdoor use. While the K13 Turbo’s display specs are currently unavailable, Samsung’s panel technology typically delivers accurate colors and wide viewing angles. The A55’s brightness is a significant differentiator, especially considering the K13 Turbo’s focus on performance might lead to higher power draw and potentially reduced screen-on time. We anticipate the K13 Turbo will likely have a higher refresh rate, but without confirmed specs, the A55 currently holds the display advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Oppo K13 Turbo, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung’s Galaxy A55 typically features a well-tuned camera system with a focus on image processing and color accuracy. The A55’s image stabilization (OIS) is a key advantage for capturing sharp photos and videos, especially in low-light conditions. We can assume the K13 Turbo will prioritize computational photography to compensate for potentially smaller sensor sizes, but the A55’s established camera reputation and OIS give it an edge. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility for serious photography.
Performance
The Oppo K13 Turbo’s Mediatek Dimensity 8450 (4nm) is the star here. Its octa-core configuration, featuring a 3.25 GHz Cortex-A725 prime core, significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A55’s Exynos 1480 (4nm). The A55’s CPU, with its 2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, is capable, but the Dimensity 8450’s architecture and clock speeds translate to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The K13 Turbo is likely to maintain higher sustained performance due to the more powerful chipset, minimizing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The A55’s Exynos 1480, while efficient, simply can’t match the raw horsepower of the Dimensity 8450.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 13:27 hours of active use. While the Oppo K13 Turbo’s battery capacity is unknown, its 80W wired charging is a game-changer. This allows for incredibly fast top-ups, potentially mitigating any capacity disadvantage. The A55’s 25W charging is comparatively slow. The K13 Turbo also supports 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 33W PPS, offering versatile charging options. The A55’s longer battery life is ideal for users who prioritize all-day usage, but the K13 Turbo’s charging speed provides a convenient workaround for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K13 Turbo if you need uncompromising performance for gaming, demanding apps, or frequent multitasking, and if 80W charging is a priority. You'll benefit from a faster, more responsive experience. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a balanced device with exceptional battery life, a bright and vibrant display, and Samsung's established software ecosystem. It's ideal for users who prioritize longevity and a smooth, reliable experience over peak performance.