Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Performance and Charging
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and sustained performance, the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro emerges as the winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset. However, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ excels in charging speed and offers a brighter display, making it ideal for users who value convenience and media consumption.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K13 Turbo Pro | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 21 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 77.2 x 7.3 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.29 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 1080p@30fps | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver Knight, Purple Phantom, Midnight Maverick | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | PLE110 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 340 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
- Potentially better thermal management due to advanced chipset architecture
- Faster processing for demanding applications
- Slower charging speed (80W vs 120W)
- Display brightness likely lower than Redmi Note 13 Pro+
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Incredibly fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 minutes)
- Brighter display (1283 nits) for better outdoor visibility
- Excellent battery life (10:38h active use)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 7200 Ultra)
- Potentially lower sustained performance in demanding games
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1283 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro’s display specifications are currently unavailable, the Redmi’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely utilizes an AMOLED panel, common in this price bracket, but details regarding refresh rate and PWM dimming are missing. The Redmi’s brightness is a clear advantage for outdoor users and those who frequently consume HDR content.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for both devices are limited. However, given the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s positioning, it likely features a high-resolution main sensor (potentially 200MP, based on previous Redmi Pro models) with optical image stabilization (OIS). The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro’s camera specifications are unknown, but its focus on performance suggests a capable imaging system. Without detailed sensor size and aperture information, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera quality, but the Redmi’s potential for a high-resolution sensor with OIS gives it an edge in detail capture and low-light performance. We can safely assume both phones will include standard wide, ultrawide, and macro lenses, though the quality of the macro lens is likely to be limited on both.
Performance
The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) chipset represents a significant leap in performance over the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm). The Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 features a unique CPU configuration – 1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 – designed for peak performance and efficiency. This contrasts with the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 configuration. The Cortex-X4 core in the Snapdragon is a higher-performance core than the A715, indicating a substantial advantage in single-core tasks and gaming. The 4nm process node in both chips ensures reasonable thermal efficiency, but the Snapdragon’s more advanced architecture suggests better sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ shines with its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro’s 80W wired charging, which, while still fast, requires more time to reach 100%. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ also boasts an active use battery score of 10:38h, indicating excellent battery life. The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but the faster charging of the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Redmi also supports PD3.0 charging, while the Oppo supports 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 33W PPS, offering more charging protocol flexibility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro if you need uncompromising CPU and GPU performance for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade off some charging speed. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a brighter screen, incredibly fast 120W charging, and a more balanced overall experience focused on everyday usability and media consumption.