Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Pro: A Deep Dive into Snapdragon Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro emerges as the stronger all-rounder. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a proven performance edge, coupled with significantly faster 125W charging and a comparable endurance rating. However, the K13 Turbo Pro’s aggressive pricing and newer chipset architecture make it a compelling option for budget-conscious gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K13 Turbo Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 21 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July 25 | Available. Released 2023, April 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 162.8 x 77.2 x 7.3 mm (6.41 x 3.04 x 0.29 in) | 161.2 x 74 x 8.6 mm (6.35 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~89.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1600 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8735 Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 825 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF, OIS 2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/1.6, (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 10-bit HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | 1080p@30fps | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) | 60 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.61µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Ready For 3.5 support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, 33W PPS Reverse wired | 125W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 6 min, 100% in 23 min 15W wireless 5W reverse wired 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 7000 mAh | Li-Po 4600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver Knight, Purple Phantom, Midnight Maverick | Interstellar Black, Lunar Blue |
| Models | PLE110 | - |
| Price | About 340 EUR | € 313.87 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -22.6 LUFS (Excellent) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1273764 (v9) GeekBench: 4896 (v5.1), 5352 (v6) GFXBench: 112fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
- Newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 chipset
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Multiple charging standards supported
- Camera specifications unknown
- Slower wired charging compared to Motorola
Motorola Edge 40 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Ultra-fast 125W wired charging
- High peak display brightness
- Older chipset generation
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1050 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the K13 Turbo Pro’s display specs are currently unavailable, Motorola’s panel offers an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without knowing the K13 Turbo Pro’s panel technology (LTPO or not), it’s difficult to assess power efficiency, but the Edge 40 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are missing for the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro’s camera system is expected to be robust, though specific sensor details are unavailable. Without knowing the K13 Turbo Pro’s sensor sizes, apertures, and image processing algorithms, it’s impossible to make a definitive comparison. We can assume Motorola will leverage its established image processing pipeline for consistent results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro utilizes the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm), featuring a 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 prime core. The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro, however, employs the newer Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 (4nm) with a 1x3.21 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core. While clock speeds are similar, the Cortex-X4 offers architectural improvements over the X3, potentially leading to better single-core performance. However, the 8 Gen 2’s more mature software optimization and superior GPU performance give it an edge in sustained workloads and gaming. Both devices utilize 4nm fabrication, but the 8 Gen 2’s larger cache and refined architecture likely translate to better thermal management under prolonged stress.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 117 hours, suggesting comparable real-world battery life despite potentially different battery capacities (unspecified for the K13 Turbo Pro). However, charging speeds are drastically different. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro supports a blazing-fast 125W wired charging, achieving 50% charge in just 6 minutes and 100% in 23 minutes. The Oppo K13 Turbo Pro offers 80W wired charging, alongside 13.5W PD, 44W UFCS, and 33W PPS, plus reverse wired charging. While the K13 Turbo Pro offers more charging *standards*, the Edge 40 Pro’s sheer speed is a significant advantage for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K13 Turbo Pro if you prioritize maximizing gaming performance within a tighter budget and value the latest chipset architecture, even if it means slightly less overall system performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Pro if you prefer a more refined, consistently powerful experience with faster charging, and are willing to pay a premium for a proven flagship platform.