Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro vs Oppo K12x: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power and Value

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo K12x and Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro represent compelling options. The K12x aims for affordability with a Mediatek Dimensity 6300, while the Civi 4 Pro steps up with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, promising a significant performance leap. This comparison dissects these two devices to determine which delivers the best experience for your money.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 offers a substantial advantage in processing power and gaming capabilities. However, the Oppo K12x remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers who value efficient performance for everyday tasks.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo K12x Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 411, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 88 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, July 292024, March 21
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, August 02Available. Released 2024, March 21
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame
Dimensions165.7 x 76 x 7.7 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.30 in)157.2 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm or 7.8 mm
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight186 g (6.56 oz)177.6 or 179.3 g or 180.9 g (6.28 oz)
Display
ProtectionPanda glassCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2
Resolution720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density)1236 x 2750 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.55 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (HBM)AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm)Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 735
OSAndroid 14, ColorOS 14Android 14, HyperOS
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXCNo
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual32 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens-
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses
Triple-50 MP, f/1.6, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
Video1080p@30/60fps4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, HDR10+, BT.2020, 10-bit video, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
Dual-32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF 32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Features-HDR, panorama
Single8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSSGPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-bandWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging45W wired, PD, 50% in 30 min67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 40 minutes
Type5100 mAhLi-Po 4700 mAh
Misc
ColorsBreeze Blue, Midnight VioletBlack, Pink, Blue, Green
ModelsCPH266724053PY09C
Price₹ 14,999About 380 EUR
SAR1.18 W/kg (head)     1.19 W/kg (body)-

Oppo K12x

  • More affordable price point
  • Efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset for everyday tasks
  • Fast 45W charging

  • Significantly less powerful than the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
  • Likely less advanced camera system
  • Potentially limited long-term software support

Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro

  • Powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 processor
  • Faster 67W charging
  • Likely superior camera performance

  • Higher price tag
  • Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
  • May require more frequent charging if battery capacity is smaller

Display Comparison

Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Civi 4 Pro's positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel with a higher refresh rate and potentially LTPO technology for variable refresh rates, improving battery life. The K12x, targeting a lower price bracket, will likely utilize a standard AMOLED panel. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely favor the Civi 4 Pro due to its higher-end components.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera specs, we can only infer. The Civi 4 Pro, being a more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The K12x will likely have a competent camera setup for its price range, but will likely lack the advanced features and image processing capabilities of the Civi 4 Pro. Lens apertures will likely be wider on the Civi 4 Pro, further enhancing low-light photography.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Oppo K12x’s Dimensity 6300 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained peak performance. The Snapdragon’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.0 GHz, provides a substantial single-core performance boost compared to the K12x’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.4 GHz. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like video editing and graphically intensive games. The Civi 4 Pro will also benefit from Qualcomm’s Adreno GPU, offering superior graphics performance.

Battery Life

While battery capacities aren't specified, the Civi 4 Pro’s 67W charging is significantly faster than the K12x’s 45W charging. The Civi 4 Pro claims a full charge in 40 minutes, while the K12x reaches 50% in 30 minutes. This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s superior power efficiency may partially offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the Civi 4 Pro, resulting in comparable real-world battery life.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo K12x if you need a reliable daily driver for social media, communication, and light gaming, and prioritize a lower price point. You'll appreciate its efficient chipset and fast charging. Buy the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and are willing to invest in a more powerful processor for longer-term usability.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Dimensity 6300 in the Oppo K12x struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Dimensity 6300 is capable of running Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Civi 4 Pro will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro compared to the 45W charging on the Oppo K12x in real-world use?
The Civi 4 Pro's 67W charging will get you from 0-100% in approximately 40 minutes, while the K12x takes longer. The difference is most noticeable in the initial stages of charging; the Civi 4 Pro will gain a substantial percentage of battery life in the first 15-20 minutes.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Civi 4 Pro tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is designed with thermal efficiency in mind. While it will generate heat during intense gaming, the 4nm process node and Qualcomm's thermal management technologies should prevent significant throttling. However, sustained peak performance may still lead to some temperature increase.