Oppo K12 vs Xiaomi 13T Pro: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13T Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ chipset delivers significantly higher performance, complemented by a brighter display and faster 120W charging. While the Oppo K12 offers respectable specs, the 13T Pro provides a more premium and future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K12 | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 24 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 29 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.5 x 75.3 x 8.4 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM), 1100 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 100% in 27 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Celadon Marble, Dark Chrome | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | PJR110 | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 250 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo K12
- Potentially more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- 100W fast charging is still very quick
- Likely a more affordable price point
- Significantly less powerful CPU and GPU than the 13T Pro
- Display likely lacks the brightness of the 13T Pro
- Camera system likely less advanced
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ chipset for superior performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Ultra-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime
- Potentially less battery efficiency than the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- May be more expensive than the Oppo K12
- Software experience may be less streamlined
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Oppo K12, whose display brightness is not specified. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display’s brightness impacts the overall user experience, especially in direct sunlight. We expect both to use AMOLED panels, but the 13T Pro’s higher peak brightness suggests a more advanced panel technology.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are missing for both devices, but we can infer some differences. The Xiaomi 13T Pro, positioned as a more premium device, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger main sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). While the Oppo K12 will likely offer a capable camera, the 13T Pro’s camera is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. We'll need to see sample images to confirm, but the 13T Pro's positioning suggests a more robust camera experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ features a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, a substantial leap over the Oppo K12’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s Cortex-A715 prime core at 2.63 GHz. This translates to noticeably faster CPU performance in benchmarks and real-world applications. The Dimensity 9200+ also benefits from a more powerful GPU, making it the superior choice for mobile gaming. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3’s 4nm process is efficient, but it can’t match the raw power of the Dimensity 9200+.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s active use score of 11:50h and endurance rating of 102h demonstrate excellent battery life. While the Oppo K12’s battery capacity is unknown, the 13T Pro’s endurance suggests a well-optimized system. Crucially, the 13T Pro supports 120W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes, significantly faster than the Oppo K12’s 100W charging (27 minutes). This faster charging speed is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K12 if you prioritize efficient power consumption and a slightly more streamlined software experience, and are comfortable with a moderate performance level. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you demand top-tier performance for gaming and demanding applications, value a brighter, more vibrant display, and appreciate the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. The 13T Pro is the clear choice for power users.