Oppo K10x vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the Oppo K10x thanks to its brighter display, more powerful chipset (Dimensity 1080), and slightly faster charging. While the K10x offers competitive charging speeds, the Redmi Note 12 Pro provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10x | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | PGGM10 | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 97h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490526 (v9) GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6) GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10x
- Fast 67W Charging
- Reliable Performance for Everyday Tasks
- Competitive Price
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
- Potentially Less Advanced Camera
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Brighter and More Vibrant Display
- More Powerful Dimensity 1080 Chipset
- Faster Charging (50% in 15 mins)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Software Bloat (Potential)
- Design May Not Appeal to Everyone
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 890 nits max brightness, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While the K10x's display is adequate, it lacks the punch and clarity of the Redmi Note 12 Pro's panel. The Redmi Note 12 Pro's infinite contrast ratio also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a slight edge due to its potentially more advanced image processing and sensor capabilities (based on typical Redmi Pro features). The Redmi Note 12 Pro's camera is expected to deliver more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. Specific camera specs would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro generally outperforms the Snapdragon 695 5G in the Oppo K10x. The Dimensity 1080's Cortex-A78 cores provide a noticeable boost in responsiveness and multitasking capabilities. While the K10x is capable for everyday tasks, the Redmi Note 12 Pro handles demanding apps and games more smoothly.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Redmi Note 12 Pro demonstrating an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours. The Oppo K10x's 67W charging is competitive, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro's faster charging speeds (50% in 15 minutes) provide a convenience advantage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K10x is a good choice for users prioritizing fast charging and a reliable, albeit slightly less powerful, processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is ideal for those seeking a vibrant display, smoother performance, and a more versatile camera system, especially if media consumption and photography are key.