Oppo's K-series consistently delivers impressive value in the budget smartphone market. The K10x and K9x are two strong contenders, each offering a unique blend of features and performance. But which one deserves your money? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K10x takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging and the generally more powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset. While the K9x offers a decent experience, the K10x's charging speed and performance edge make it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2021, December 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2021, December 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.8 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Aluminosilicate glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.49 inches, 102.2 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97”, 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0”, 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min | 33W wired, 50% in 27 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Black, Blue |
| Models | PGGM10 | PGCM10 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 190 EUR |
Oppo K10x
- Faster Charging (67W)
- Generally Better Performance (Snapdragon 695)
- Potentially Better Low-Light Camera
- 5G Connectivity
- May have slightly higher price
- Design might be less premium than some competitors
Oppo K9x
- Potentially more compact design
- Good Value for Money
- Decent Performance for everyday tasks
- Slower Charging (33W)
- Lower Performance than K10x
- Camera may not be as good in low light
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely LCD) and resolution, around 6.4-6.5 inches. Expect FHD+ resolution. The K10x *might* have slightly better color accuracy or brightness, but this is difficult to confirm without specific testing data. Refresh rate is likely 60Hz or 90Hz on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are difficult to confirm precisely without official data. Both likely feature a multi-lens setup with a primary sensor around 64MP. Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. Expect similar performance in good lighting conditions, but the K10x *might* have a slight edge in low-light photography due to potentially better image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 in the K10x generally outperforms the MediaTek Dimensity 810 in the K9x in most benchmarks and real-world usage. The Snapdragon 695's Kryo 660 cores offer a performance advantage, leading to smoother multitasking and better gaming performance. The K9x is still capable, but the K10x provides a noticeable boost.
Battery Life
The K10x's 67W charging is a major advantage. It can charge from 0 to 80% in just 33 minutes, significantly faster than the K9x's 33W charging, which takes longer. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so the K10x's faster charging makes it the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K10x is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and a smoother overall experience, especially those who game or multitask frequently. The Oppo K9x is a good option for budget-conscious buyers who don't heavily rely on demanding applications and appreciate a slightly more compact design (assuming it's smaller, which is typical for K9x models).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo K10x worth the extra money?
If fast charging and smoother performance are important to you, then yes, the K10x is worth the extra investment. The charging speed alone is a significant advantage.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Oppo K10x, thanks to its Snapdragon 695 chipset, will generally offer better gaming performance than the K9x with the Dimensity 810.
