Oppo K10x vs Oppo Find X2 Pro: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo Find X2 Pro is the clear winner, offering superior performance, a flagship camera system, and a stunning display. The K10x provides excellent value for money, but can't match the Find X2 Pro's overall capabilities. It's a trade-off between price and premium features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10x | Oppo Find X2 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2020, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2020, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), ceramic back or leather back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 165.2 x 74.4 x 8.8 mm (Ceramic) / 9.5mm (Leather) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 217 g (Ceramic) / 200 g (Leather) (7.05 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 mins) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~513 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.43", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 129mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS; HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 38 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4260 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Black, Orange, Gray, Green, Lamborghini Edition |
| Models | PGGM10 | CPH2025, PDEM30, OPG01 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 88h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 593717 (v8) GeekBench: 13245 (v4.4), 3269 (v5.1) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10x
- Excellent value for money
- Fast 67W charging
- Decent 5G connectivity
- Good battery life
- Lower performance than flagship phones
- Less premium display
- Camera not as advanced
- Older chipset
Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Flagship performance with Snapdragon 865
- Exceptional camera system
- Stunning, bright display
- Premium build quality
- Higher price
- Older model (may lack latest software updates)
- Battery may have degraded over time (being an older device)
Display Comparison
The Find X2 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display (871 nits vs likely around 480 nits for the K10x) and an 'infinite' contrast ratio, providing a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. While the K10x's display is adequate, it lacks the premium feel of the Find X2 Pro's panel. The Find X2 Pro likely also has a higher refresh rate.
Camera Comparison
The Find X2 Pro's camera system was a flagship-level offering at its release, featuring advanced sensors and image processing capabilities. While the K10x has a capable camera, it can't compete with the Find X2 Pro's image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. Expect better zoom capabilities and video recording quality on the Find X2 Pro.
Performance
The Snapdragon 865 in the Find X2 Pro delivers vastly superior performance compared to the Snapdragon 695 in the K10x. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Find X2 Pro. The 865's architecture is also more efficient for sustained performance.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life with endurance ratings of 88h. The Find X2 Pro's 65W charging is slightly slower than the K10x's 67W, but the difference is minimal in real-world usage. Both charge quickly.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K10x is ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize fast charging and a decent 5G experience. The Oppo Find X2 Pro is for those seeking a top-tier camera, blazing-fast performance, and a premium display, regardless of price.