Oppo K10x vs Google Pixel 5: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 5 wins overall thanks to its superior camera, software experience, and longer-term software support. However, the Oppo K10x offers significantly faster charging and a more budget-friendly price point, making it a strong choice for those prioritizing speed and value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10x | Google Pixel 5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 258, 260, 261 Sub6/mmWave - GD1YQ |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 28, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 Sub6 - GTT9Q | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 16 | 2020, September 30 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 22 | Available. Released 2020, October 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 144.7 x 70.4 x 8 mm (5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 151 g (5.33 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~432 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.0 inches, 87.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | OLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765G 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min | 18W wired, PD2.0 12W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4080 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Just Black, Sorta Sage |
| Models | PGGM10 | GD1YQ, GTT9Q, G5NZ6 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 181.31 / $ 272.44 / £ 136.00 |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | $ 194.84 |
| RENEWED | - | $ 253.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 95h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Oppo K10x
- 67W Fast Charging
- More Affordable
- Decent Performance for the Price
- 5G Connectivity
- Lower Camera Quality
- Less Premium Build
- Potentially Shorter Software Support
Google Pixel 5
- Exceptional Camera
- Clean Android Experience
- Long-Term Software Updates
- Bright and High-Contrast Display
- Excellent Battery Life
- Slower Charging
- Higher Price
- Older Chipset (compared to newer flagships)
Display Comparison
The Pixel 5 boasts a brighter display (699 nits) and an infinite contrast ratio, offering a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The K10x's display is likely good, but lacks the Pixel 5's premium quality. Color accuracy and overall visual appeal favor the Pixel 5.
Camera Comparison
This is where the Pixel 5 truly shines. Google's computational photography is unmatched, delivering consistently excellent photos in various conditions. The K10x's camera is decent for its price range, but it can't compete with the Pixel 5's image quality, dynamic range, and low-light performance. Pixel 5 also has better video recording capabilities.
Performance
While the Snapdragon 695 in the K10x is a capable mid-range chip, the Snapdragon 765G in the Pixel 5 provides a noticeable performance boost, especially in demanding tasks and gaming. The Pixel 5's CPU architecture also offers slightly better efficiency. The K10x's 6nm process is more efficient than the Pixel 5's 7nm.
Battery Life
The Pixel 5's endurance rating of 95h is exceptional, indicating outstanding battery life. The K10x's battery life is likely good, but not as impressive. However, the K10x's 67W charging blows the Pixel 5's 18W charging out of the water, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K10x? Users seeking a fast-charging, budget-conscious phone for everyday tasks and gaming. Who should buy the Google Pixel 5? Photography enthusiasts, Android purists, and those who value long-term software updates and a premium software experience.