The Oppo K10 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches to achieving it. The K10 prioritizes a streamlined experience with a focus on efficiency, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G pushes for faster charging and 5G connectivity. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and future-proofing with 5G, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers 5G capabilities the K10 lacks. However, the K10 remains a strong contender for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 29 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Carbon, Blue Flame | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | CPH2373 | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10
- Potentially lower price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Reverse wired charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Slower 33W charging
- Display brightness likely lower
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Brighter display (746 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Snapdragon 695 may throttle more under sustained load
- No specific details on display calibration
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Oppo K10. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price bracket), the Redmi’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. Both displays have an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical for IPS LCDs. The lack of information on the K10’s display calibration makes it difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is likely to offer a more vibrant viewing experience due to its higher peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are lacking. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s brand positioning suggests a greater emphasis on camera performance. It’s reasonable to assume the Redmi will offer more sophisticated image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (a common feature in this price range) would further enhance image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The K10 likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for potentially less capable hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo K10 uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm), while the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features the Snapdragon 695 5G (also 6nm). The 695, with its 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores, offers a slight CPU performance advantage over the K10’s 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver configuration. More importantly, the 695 integrates a 5G modem, providing future-proof connectivity. The 6nm process node in both chips ensures reasonable power efficiency, but the 695’s architecture is more modern, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. The K10's 4G limitation is a significant drawback for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the lack of specific mAh capacities. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s 67W charging can reach 50% in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes, a significant advantage over the Oppo K10’s 33W charging (50% in 26 minutes). The Redmi also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider compatibility with fast chargers. While both support reverse wired charging, the faster charging speed of the Redmi makes it more convenient for quickly topping up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 if you need a reliable, efficient phone for everyday tasks and prioritize value over bleeding-edge features. It's ideal for users who don't heavily rely on 5G or demand the fastest charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you prefer faster charging, 5G connectivity for future network compatibility, and a slightly brighter display, even if it comes at a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 680?
While both chips are 6nm, the Snapdragon 695's slightly higher performance ceiling means it's more likely to generate heat under sustained load. Expect some throttling during prolonged gaming, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely has adequate thermal management to prevent severe performance drops. The K10's 680 will likely remain cooler, but at the cost of lower peak performance.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the Oppo K10 a significant limitation in 2024, even if 5G coverage isn't widespread in my area?
Even with limited current coverage, the absence of 5G on the K10 limits its future-proofing. 5G networks are expanding rapidly, and a 5G-capable phone like the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G will remain relevant for longer. Resale value will also be impacted by the lack of 5G support.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G affect battery health over the long term?
While faster charging can theoretically contribute to slightly faster battery degradation, modern charging algorithms mitigate this effect. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G employs intelligent charging management to minimize heat and optimize charging cycles, ensuring minimal impact on long-term battery health. The convenience of rapid charging often outweighs the minor potential for accelerated degradation.
