The Oppo K10 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The K10 prioritizes a streamlined experience with a focus on efficiency, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G pushes for 5G connectivity and faster charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers 5G connectivity and a performance edge, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, users on a tighter budget who don't need 5G will find the Oppo K10 a capable and efficient alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 29 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Carbon, Blue Flame | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CPH2373 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset for everyday tasks
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable brand reputation (Oppo)
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower 33W charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the Poco X4 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 5G chipset
- Potentially higher price
- Battery life may be slightly shorter under heavy load
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither display will dynamically adjust refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific sensor details are absent. Without knowing megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on software processing to enhance image quality. The absence of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) indicates that both phones will likely struggle in low-light conditions without significant digital stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) boasts a more modern architecture with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores, compared to the K10’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Poco X4 Pro 5G in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 5G modem in the 695 also provides future-proofing, while the K10 is limited to 4G. The 6nm process node in both chips contributes to reasonable power efficiency, but the 695’s architectural improvements likely yield better sustained performance under load.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the K10’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging can reach 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the K10’s 33W charging takes 26 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging is a significant advantage for the Poco X4 Pro 5G, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 if you need a reliable, efficient smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize long-term software support within the Oppo ecosystem. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily rely on mobile gaming or 5G connectivity. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you prefer faster charging, 5G capabilities for future network access, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming, even if it means potentially shorter battery life under heavy load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings for a consistently smooth experience. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it offers a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo K10 for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Oppo K10 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is significantly faster. While the K10 takes over 26 minutes to reach 50%, the Poco X4 Pro 5G achieves 70% in the same timeframe. This means you can get a substantial charge in a much shorter period, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Will the lack of 5G on the Oppo K10 be a significant limitation in the next few years?
That depends on your location and usage. 5G is becoming increasingly widespread, but 4G remains perfectly adequate for most users. If you live in an area with limited 5G coverage or don't frequently stream high-bandwidth content, the lack of 5G on the K10 won't be a major issue. However, for future-proofing, the Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice.
