The Oppo K10 and vivo iQOO Neo 6 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The K10 focuses on affordability and efficiency with the Snapdragon 680, while the iQOO Neo 6 aims for a more premium experience with the significantly more powerful Snapdragon 870. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth performance and fast charging, the vivo iQOO Neo 6 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset offers a substantial performance leap over the Oppo K10’s Snapdragon 680, and the 80W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the K10 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 29 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Carbon, Blue Flame | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | CPH2373 | I2126 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10
- More affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially longer standby time due to efficient chipset
- Significantly slower performance
- Slower charging speeds
- Less capable camera system (likely)
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Much faster performance with Snapdragon 870
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price tag
- No reverse wired charging
- Potentially shorter standby time due to more powerful chipset
Display Comparison
The iQOO Neo 6 boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 772 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the K10. While both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points, the higher peak brightness of the iQOO Neo 6 translates to better visibility outdoors. Contrast ratio is listed as infinite (nominal) for the iQOO Neo 6, typical of LCDs, but the K10’s contrast ratio is not specified. The absence of details like refresh rate or PWM dimming frequency for both devices makes a complete display assessment difficult, but the iQOO Neo 6’s brightness advantage is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. However, given the iQOO Neo 6’s positioning as a more premium device, it likely incorporates a more capable camera system. The omission of details suggests neither phone will challenge flagship camera performance, and users should temper expectations. The K10 likely prioritizes cost savings in this area.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference. The iQOO Neo 6’s Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo K10’s Snapdragon 680 4G (6nm). The 870 features a Kryo 585 core configuration with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, compared to the K10’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a far superior gaming experience on the iQOO Neo 6. The 7nm process node of the 870 also allows for more efficient power management under sustained load. While the K10’s 6nm node is more efficient at idle, it cannot compete with the 870’s raw processing power.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 97 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the K10’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The iQOO Neo 6’s 80W wired charging can reach 50% in just 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes, while the K10’s 33W charging takes 26 minutes to reach 50%. This charging speed difference is a major advantage for the iQOO Neo 6, minimizing downtime and offering greater convenience. The K10 also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent from the iQOO Neo 6.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and prioritize long-term battery life over raw power. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 6 if you prefer a smoother experience for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo K10 sufficient for playing demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 680 can handle less graphically intensive games, it will struggle with demanding titles like Genshin Impact. Expect low frame rates and significant graphical compromises. The iQOO Neo 6’s Snapdragon 870 is far better suited for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the iQOO Neo 6 compared to the 33W charging on the Oppo K10 in a typical use case?
The iQOO Neo 6 can charge from 0-50% in just 12 minutes, while the K10 takes 26 minutes for the same. This means you can get a substantial charge in a very short amount of time with the iQOO Neo 6, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo 6 support 5G connectivity, and will this be a benefit for users in areas with 5G coverage?
Yes, the iQOO Neo 6 utilizes the Snapdragon 870 5G chipset, offering 5G connectivity. If you live in an area with 5G coverage, you'll experience significantly faster download and upload speeds compared to the Oppo K10, which is limited to 4G.
