The Oppo K10 and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 smartphone market. The K10 focuses on delivering a solid, reliable experience with a focus on value, while the Edge 30 Neo aims to elevate the experience with faster charging and 5G connectivity. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers 5G connectivity and a slight performance edge, complemented by significantly faster 68W charging. However, the Oppo K10 remains a strong contender for those on a tighter budget who don't require 5G.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | IP5X (dust), IPX4 (water) resistance | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, March 23 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 29 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, PD, 50% in 26 min
Reverse wired | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Carbon, Blue Flame | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | CPH2373 | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10
- Lower price point makes it more accessible.
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 chipset for everyday tasks.
- Reverse wired charging offers added versatility.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
- Slower 33W charging.
- Potentially less future-proof chipset.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Significantly faster 68W wired and 5W wireless charging.
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset.
- Higher price compared to the Oppo K10.
- Battery life is similar despite faster charging.
- Camera performance details are unknown.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1004 nits, making it more usable outdoors in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo K10 (brightness data unavailable). While both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology (inferred from 'Infinite' contrast ratio on the Motorola), the Edge 30 Neo’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, given their price points, and color accuracy is likely to be good on both, though specific calibration data is missing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are lacking. The Edge 30 Neo likely benefits from Motorola’s image processing algorithms, potentially offering better dynamic range and low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. The Edge 30 Neo’s 5G modem may also enable faster video uploads.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s Snapdragon 695 5G represents a clear step up from the Oppo K10’s Snapdragon 680. Both are 6nm chips, but the 695 features Kryo 660 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, compared to the K10’s Kryo 265 cores at 2.4 GHz. While the K10’s cores have a slightly higher clock speed, the 695’s architecture and 5G modem provide a more well-rounded experience. The Edge 30 Neo will handle multitasking and demanding apps more smoothly. RAM configurations are unknown, but LPDDR4X is likely on the K10, while the Edge 30 Neo may benefit from LPDDR5 for faster memory access.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 104 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (data unavailable). However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a game-changer, promising significantly faster top-ups. The K10’s 33W charging, while respectable, pales in comparison. The Edge 30 Neo also adds 5W wireless charging, a convenience feature absent on the K10. A full charge from 0-100% on the Edge 30 Neo is expected to take considerably less time than the K10’s 26 minutes to 50%.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 if you need a dependable smartphone for everyday tasks, prioritize a lower upfront cost, and don't heavily rely on 5G connectivity. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer faster charging speeds, want the benefits of 5G, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more modern chipset and potentially longer software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Motorola Edge 30 Neo get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo K10?
While both chips are 6nm, the Snapdragon 695 is more powerful and thus *may* generate more heat under sustained load. However, Motorola’s thermal management implementation will be crucial. Without thermal testing data, it’s difficult to say definitively, but the Edge 30 Neo’s larger surface area could aid in heat dissipation.
❓ Is the 5W wireless charging on the Motorola Edge 30 Neo practical for daily use, or is it too slow to be useful?
5W wireless charging is relatively slow and best suited for overnight or occasional top-ups. It’s not a replacement for wired charging, but it offers a convenient way to charge the phone without cables, especially if you have a wireless charging pad on your desk or nightstand.
❓ Given the similar endurance ratings, does the faster charging of the Motorola Edge 30 Neo negate the need for a larger battery capacity?
Yes, the faster charging effectively mitigates the need for a significantly larger battery. Even if the Edge 30 Neo has a slightly smaller battery, the ability to quickly top it up means you’re less likely to experience range anxiety. A quick 15-20 minute charge can provide several hours of usage.
