Oppo K10 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K60E: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi K60E edges out the Oppo K10 Pro thanks to its more modern Dimensity 8200 chipset and slightly better overall efficiency. While the K10 Pro boasts faster charging, the K60E’s balanced performance and features make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 Pro | Xiaomi Redmi K60E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5 , 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, December 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, December 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163.1 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 31 min | 67W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Green |
| Models | PGIM10 | 22122RK93C |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Oppo K10 Pro
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Familiar Snapdragon chipset
- Good overall design
- Competitive price
- Older chipset (Snapdragon 888)
- Can run hot under load
- Display may not be as vibrant as K60E
Xiaomi Redmi K60E
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 8200 chipset
- Likely brighter and smoother display
- Excellent value for money
- Good camera performance
- Slower charging speed (67W)
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be polarizing
- Availability may vary by region
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays, but the Redmi K60E likely has a slightly brighter panel and potentially a higher refresh rate (often 120Hz). The K10 Pro's display is still very good, but the K60E's may offer a more immersive viewing experience. Color accuracy is generally good on both.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely comparable, with both phones offering versatile camera systems. The Redmi K60E may have a slight edge in image processing and low-light performance due to its newer chipset and potentially improved software algorithms. Both should capture good photos and videos in various conditions.
Performance
The Redmi K60E's Dimensity 8200 is a newer and more efficient chipset than the Snapdragon 888 in the K10 Pro. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the K60E. While the 888 is still capable, it can run hotter under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10 Pro's 80W charging is significantly faster than the Redmi K60E's 67W charging. However, the Redmi K60E's more efficient chipset may result in longer battery life between charges, offsetting the charging speed difference.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K10 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing extremely fast charging and a familiar Snapdragon experience. The Xiaomi Redmi K60E is a better fit for those seeking a more powerful and efficient processor, a vibrant display, and a well-rounded feature set at a competitive price.