Oppo K10 Pro vs Xiaomi 11T Pro: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi 11T Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 120W charging, brighter display, and generally more refined software experience. While the Oppo K10 Pro offers good value, the Xiaomi's superior charging and display make it the better overall choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 Pro | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5 , 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 31 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | PGIM10 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 360 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
Oppo K10 Pro
- Good value for money
- Decent performance
- Fast 80W charging
- Less bright display
- Slightly less refined software
- Camera not as impressive as Xiaomi
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Excellent camera performance
- Polished software experience
- Potentially higher price
- Design may not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Xiaomi 11T Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 837 nits, significantly brighter than the K10 Pro. The Xiaomi also advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the K10 Pro's display is good, the 11T Pro's is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is a complex area. While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Xiaomi 11T Pro generally receives praise for its image processing and video recording capabilities. The K10 Pro's camera is decent, but may lack the same level of detail and dynamic range as the Xiaomi.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the Snapdragon 888, ensuring smooth performance for everyday tasks and demanding games. Real-world performance will likely be very similar, with minor differences potentially arising from software optimization. However, thermal management could be a factor during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 11T Pro's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. It can reach 72% in just 10 minutes and 100% in 17 minutes. The Oppo K10 Pro's 80W charging is still fast, but not as impressive. The Xiaomi also boasts an endurance rating of 92h, suggesting excellent battery life even with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K10 Pro? Users prioritizing a slightly more budget-friendly option and don't heavily rely on ultra-fast charging. Who should buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro? Those seeking the fastest charging speeds available, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more polished software experience.