Oppo K10 Pro vs. Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon): A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K10 Pro takes the lead with its significantly faster Snapdragon 888 chipset and blazing-fast 80W charging. However, the Reno6 Pro 5G boasts excellent battery life and a potentially more refined camera experience, making it a strong contender for users prioritizing longevity and photography.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 Pro | Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5 , 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2021, September 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2021, September 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 160.8 x 72.5 x 8 mm (6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~397 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.62 inches, 106.3 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~88.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HDR), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 16 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, panorama | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 100% in 31 min | 65W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Arctic Blue, Lunar Grey |
| Models | PGIM10 | CPH2247 |
| Price | About 360 EUR | About 230 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 108h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 671577 (v9) GeekBench: 2941 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 Pro
- Superior Performance (Snapdragon 888)
- Blazing-Fast 80W Charging
- Likely Higher Display Brightness
- Modern Design
- Potentially Shorter Battery Life
- Camera may not be as refined as Reno6 Pro
- May lack some of Reno6 Pro's premium features
Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)
- Exceptional Battery Life (108h Endurance)
- Refined Camera System
- Sleek and Premium Design
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower Performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Slower Charging (65W)
- Lower Max Display Brightness (potentially)
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The Reno6 Pro 5G's 780 nits max brightness is respectable, while the K10 Pro likely has a slightly higher brightness, though specific measurements are needed. The Reno6 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio is a marketing term, but suggests excellent contrast. The K10 Pro may offer a slightly smoother display experience depending on its refresh rate (likely 120Hz).
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer capable camera systems, the Reno6 Pro 5G is generally considered to have a more refined camera experience, particularly in video recording. The K10 Pro's camera is still good, but may not match the Reno6 Pro's image processing and overall quality. Specific camera specs (sensor sizes, aperture) would be needed for a more detailed comparison.
Performance
The K10 Pro's Snapdragon 888 is a clear winner here. It offers significantly more processing power than the Reno6 Pro's Snapdragon 870, resulting in faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. The 5nm process of the 888 also contributes to improved efficiency compared to the 7nm 870.
Battery Life
The Reno6 Pro 5G shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 108 hours is exceptional. The K10 Pro, while having a decent battery capacity, is likely to drain faster due to the more power-hungry Snapdragon 888. However, the K10 Pro's 80W charging more than compensates, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Oppo K10 Pro? Gamers and power users seeking top-tier performance and rapid charging will appreciate the K10 Pro. Who should buy the Oppo Reno6 Pro 5G (Snapdragon)? Users prioritizing long battery life, a sleek design, and a well-rounded camera system will find the Reno6 Pro 5G a better fit.