The Oppo K10 Energy and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a smooth user experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a generally smoother experience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Oppo K10 Energy’s 30W, and while the Snapdragon 695 isn’t as powerful as the 778G, it’s sufficient for everyday tasks and moderate gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Oppo K10 Energy
- More powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Potentially better sustained gaming performance
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 30W charging
- Likely less refined software experience
- Potentially less capable camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Likely better camera performance (based on series history)
- Potentially more optimized software (MIUI)
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 processor
- May struggle with demanding games at max settings
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 11 Pro+’s positioning, it likely features an AMOLED panel, common in the series, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The K10 Energy, being a more budget-focused device, may utilize an LCD. The absence of refresh rate data is notable; a higher refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz) would benefit gaming and scrolling smoothness on either device.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is known for its 108MP main sensor (not provided in the context, but a known feature of the device), which generally captures more detail than the likely lower-resolution sensor on the K10 Energy. The image processing algorithms employed by Xiaomi’s MIUI often prioritize vibrant, social media-ready images, while Oppo’s ColorOS tends towards more natural color reproduction. The absence of OIS information is a drawback for both, potentially leading to less stable video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 Energy boasts the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.4GHz. This is a significantly more powerful processor than the Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India), which uses Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2GHz. The 778G’s architecture, with its more capable prime core, translates to better CPU and GPU performance, particularly in sustained workloads like gaming. While both are 6nm chips, the 778G’s superior design provides a clear advantage. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ may compensate with potentially more optimized software.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) shines with its 67W wired charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 42 minutes. This is a substantial improvement over the Oppo K10 Energy’s 30W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The 5W reverse wired charging on the K10 Energy is a niche feature, useful for topping up accessories but not a primary selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 Energy if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding applications and gaming, and are willing to trade off charging speed. The Snapdragon 778G offers a noticeable performance advantage. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value incredibly fast charging, a more refined software experience (typically associated with Xiaomi’s MIUI), and a balance between performance and battery life for everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 is capable, Genshin Impact and similar titles will likely require reduced graphics settings for a smooth experience. The Snapdragon 778G in the Oppo K10 Energy will handle these games more comfortably at higher settings, but both phones will experience some level of thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ compared to the 30W charging on the Oppo K10 Energy in real-world use?
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ can charge from 0-100% in approximately 42 minutes, while the Oppo K10 Energy will take considerably longer, likely exceeding 1 hour and 30 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Oppo K10 Energy’s Snapdragon 778G offer a noticeable advantage in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For typical daily usage, the difference in performance between the two chipsets will be minimal. Both phones will handle these tasks smoothly. The Snapdragon 778G’s advantage becomes more apparent in demanding applications and multitasking scenarios.
