The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo K10 Energy and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a smooth experience, they take different approaches to achieving it – the K10 Energy prioritizing raw processing power with the Snapdragon 778G, while the Poco X4 Pro focuses on rapid charging and respectable endurance. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K10 Energy emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Poco X4 Pro’s Snapdragon 695, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Poco X4 Pro boasts faster 67W charging, the K10 Energy’s superior processing power offers a more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | - | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 Energy
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 778G
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Slower 30W charging
- Missing detailed display specifications
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- Competitive battery endurance (119h)
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Limited processing power for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the price points, we can assume both utilize 6.67-inch displays, common in this segment. The lack of LTPO technology suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving. The real-world difference will likely come down to color calibration and viewing angles, areas requiring hands-on testing.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific sensor details are absent. Without knowing megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the omission of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) suggests neither phone prioritizes advanced camera features. The usefulness of a 2MP macro camera on either device is questionable, serving primarily as a marketing feature. Image processing algorithms will likely be the differentiating factor, and user reviews will be crucial in determining which phone produces more pleasing results in various lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 Energy’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a significantly more capable processor than the Poco X4 Pro’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The 778G features a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.4 GHz, alongside three additional Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz, and four efficiency cores. This contrasts with the 695’s two Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz and six Kryo 660 Silver cores. This architectural difference translates to roughly 30-40% better CPU performance for the K10 Energy in benchmarks, and a substantial improvement in GPU performance. The K10 Energy will handle demanding games and multitasking with greater ease. While both use 6nm fabrication, the 778G’s more advanced core design provides a clear advantage.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite the lack of specific mAh capacities. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W wired charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is a major selling point, achieving 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Oppo K10 Energy’s 30W charging is considerably slower. While the K10 Energy’s potentially more efficient chipset might offset some of this difference, the Poco X4 Pro offers a significantly faster top-up time for users who frequently need to recharge quickly. The K10 Energy also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Poco X4 Pro.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 Energy if you prioritize performance for gaming, demanding apps, and future-proofing. Its Snapdragon 778G offers a significant step up in processing capability. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if rapid charging is your absolute top priority and you primarily use your phone for basic tasks like social media, calls, and light browsing. The 67W charging is a genuine time-saver, but comes at the cost of overall processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering. The Snapdragon 778G in the K10 Energy will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro compared to the 30W charging on the Oppo K10 Energy in real-world use?
The Poco X4 Pro can charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 41 minutes, while the Oppo K10 Energy will take considerably longer, likely exceeding 1 hour and 30 minutes. This means you can get a significant charge boost in a much shorter time with the Poco X4 Pro, ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Oppo K10 Energy's Snapdragon 778G offer noticeable improvements in app loading times compared to the Poco X4 Pro?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G's more powerful CPU and GPU will result in noticeably faster app loading times, especially for larger and more complex applications. Multitasking will also feel smoother and more responsive on the K10 Energy.
