The Oppo K10 Energy and vivo V23 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices aim for a balance of features and affordability, they take distinctly different approaches. The K10 Energy focuses on delivering strong processing power with the Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the V23 5G emphasizes a sleek design and rapid charging capabilities with the Dimensity 920.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo K10 Energy is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 778G 5G chipset offers a slight edge in CPU and GPU performance. However, the vivo V23 5G excels in charging speed, reaching 68% in just 30 minutes, making it ideal for those constantly on the go.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 7, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, January 05 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, January 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Schott Xensation Up), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 157.2 x 72.4 x 7.4 or 7.6 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 179 g or 181 g (6.31 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Schott Xensation Up |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF
8 MP, f/2.3, 105˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi 6 (market dependent), dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | Color changing back panel when exposed to sunlight |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired
5W reverse wired | 44W wired, 68% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Sunshine Gold, Stardust Black |
| Models | - | V2130, V2303 |
| Price | - | About 280 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.72 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 103h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.5 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 406498 (v8), 476058 (v9)
GeekBench: 8421 (v4.4), 2140 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 Energy
- Stronger CPU performance for multitasking
- Potentially better gaming performance with Adreno 642L GPU
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Display brightness and quality are unknown
vivo V23 5G
- Faster 44W charging (68% in 30 minutes)
- Higher peak display brightness (629 nits)
- Likely superior selfie camera quality
- Slightly less powerful CPU for sustained workloads
- GPU performance is slightly lower than the Snapdragon 778G
Display Comparison
The vivo V23 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 629 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Oppo K10 Energy (brightness data unavailable). While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the V23’s display benefits from an 'infinite' contrast ratio, likely achieved through OLED technology, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The K10 Energy’s panel specifications are not provided, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and viewing angles difficult, but it's likely an LCD panel given the price point.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the market positioning suggests the V23 5G may prioritize selfie camera quality, a common strength of vivo devices. The K10 Energy likely focuses on providing a versatile camera system for everyday use. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo K10 Energy features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, while the vivo V23 5G utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 920. Both are 6nm chips, but the Snapdragon 778G’s Cortex-A78 prime core runs at 2.4 GHz, slightly faster than the Dimensity 920’s 2.5 GHz, but the Dimensity 920 has two of those cores versus the Snapdragon’s single core. The Snapdragon 778G’s Adreno 642L GPU is generally considered to offer a slight edge in gaming performance over the Dimensity 920’s Mali-G68 MC4. The K10 Energy’s CPU configuration (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) suggests a focus on sustained multi-core performance, while the V23’s (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) prioritizes peak performance.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 103 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The vivo V23 5G’s 44W wired charging can reach 68% in just 30 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Oppo K10 Energy’s 30W charging. The K10 Energy also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories, which the V23 5G lacks. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the V23 5G mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 Energy if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and multitasking without significant slowdown. Its Snapdragon 778G provides a more robust platform for power users. Buy the vivo V23 5G if you prioritize a faster charging experience and a phone that can quickly top up between uses, even if it means a slight compromise in peak processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 920 in the vivo V23 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 920 is a capable chipset, it can experience some thermal throttling during extended gaming. However, vivo's software optimizations and the phone's cooling system generally mitigate this issue, preventing significant performance drops. The Snapdragon 778G in the K10 Energy is known for its thermal efficiency, potentially offering slightly more consistent performance over longer periods.
❓ Is the 5W reverse wired charging on the Oppo K10 Energy useful for more than just earbuds?
Yes, the 5W reverse wired charging can be used to top up other devices like smartwatches, fitness trackers, or even another smartphone in an emergency. While it's a slow charging speed, it provides a convenient way to share power when an outlet isn't available. The V23 5G lacks this feature entirely.
❓ How does the camera processing differ between the Oppo K10 Energy and the vivo V23 5G?
Vivo typically employs a more vibrant and 'beauty-focused' image processing style, particularly in selfie cameras. Oppo generally aims for more natural and accurate color reproduction. Without detailed camera samples, it's difficult to quantify the difference, but users should expect distinct aesthetic preferences between the two devices.
