Oppo's K-series consistently delivers strong value in the mid-range segment. The K10 Energy and K10x represent two distinct approaches: the K10 Energy prioritizes processing power with the Snapdragon 778G, while the K10x focuses on rapid charging with its 67W capability. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, the Oppo K10 Energy is the clear winner thanks to its superior Snapdragon 778G chipset. However, the K10x’s significantly faster 67W charging is a compelling advantage for those who value convenience and minimal downtime.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 30W wired
5W reverse wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Blue, Black |
| Models | - | PGGM10 |
| Price | - | About 210 EUR |
Oppo K10 Energy
- Superior Snapdragon 778G performance
- More powerful GPU for gaming
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Slower 30W charging
- Likely less optimized camera software
Oppo K10x
- Ultra-fast 67W charging (80% in 33 min)
- Potentially better battery life due to efficient chipset
- Competitive price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
Neither Oppo provides display specs beyond resolution, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K10x's focus on value, it likely utilizes a slightly less premium panel than the K10 Energy. The K10 Energy, positioned as a slightly more premium option, may benefit from marginally better color accuracy and viewing angles. Both are expected to feature standard LCD panels common in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, both phones likely employ similar sensor configurations targeting the budget-conscious market. The image processing capabilities will likely differ, with Oppo’s software optimizations potentially playing a larger role than the sensor itself. We anticipate both phones will perform adequately in well-lit conditions, but struggle in low-light scenarios. The absence of OIS on either model suggests reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 Energy’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – an octa-core setup with a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.4 GHz, alongside three additional Cortex-A78 cores at 2.2 GHz. This contrasts with the K10x’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), which uses two Kryo 660 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz and six Kryo 660 Silver cores at 1.7 GHz. The 778G’s architecture, with its higher-clocked and more numerous A78 cores, translates to significantly better multi-core and single-core performance, particularly noticeable in gaming and demanding applications. The 778G also features a more capable Adreno 642L GPU, further enhancing gaming capabilities compared to the K10x’s Adreno 619.
Battery Life
The K10 Energy offers 30W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging, while the K10x boasts a significantly faster 67W wired charging capability. While battery capacity isn't specified, the K10x’s charging speed is the standout feature. Oppo claims an 80% charge in just 33 minutes, a substantial advantage over the K10 Energy’s slower charging. This difference is crucial for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery. The K10 Energy’s 5W reverse charging is a niche feature for topping up accessories, but the K10x lacks this functionality.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 Energy if you need a phone capable of handling graphically intensive games and multitasking without significant slowdown. Its Snapdragon 778G offers a noticeable performance edge. Buy the Oppo K10x if you prioritize quick top-ups and don't heavily rely on demanding applications; the 67W charging will get you back to 100% much faster, making it ideal for busy users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the K10x struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset, but it's not designed for high-end gaming. While you can run Genshin Impact on the K10x, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The K10 Energy’s Snapdragon 778G will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the K10x compared to the 30W charging on the K10 Energy in real-world use?
Oppo claims the K10x can reach 80% charge in 33 minutes. The K10 Energy, with its 30W charging, will likely take over an hour to reach the same charge level. This difference is substantial for users who need a quick power boost before leaving the house or during a busy day.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the K10 Energy get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is generally well-managed in terms of thermals. While it will get warm during extended gaming, Oppo’s cooling solutions should prevent significant throttling. The 6nm process node contributes to better efficiency compared to older chipsets, minimizing heat generation.
