Oppo K10 Energy vs OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around performance and incredibly fast charging, the OnePlus Nord 2T emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers a noticeable performance edge, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer. However, the Oppo K10 Energy remains a compelling option for those seeking a more efficient processor and a potentially longer-lasting battery experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 Energy | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 11.2 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Unspecified | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired 5W reverse wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | - | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | - | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 Energy
- More efficient Snapdragon 778G processor
- 5W Reverse Wired Charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Slower 30W charging
- Less powerful processor than Nord 2T
- Display specs are unknown
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Faster Dimensity 1300 processor
- 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD
- Brighter display (636 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wireless charging
- Dimensity 1300 may run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 636 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the K10 Energy. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on brand trends), the Nord 2T’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The Nord 2T also claims an 'infinite' contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED technology, providing deep blacks and vibrant colors. Without specific display specs for the K10 Energy, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or refresh rate, but the Nord 2T’s brighter panel gives it a clear advantage for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market positioning of OnePlus suggests a greater emphasis on image processing and software optimization. The Nord 2T likely benefits from OnePlus’s established camera algorithms. The K10 Energy, while capable, may prioritize a more natural image profile. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess low-light performance. We can assume both will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size and aperture.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s MediaTek Dimensity 1300, with its 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core and 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a significant clock speed advantage over the Oppo K10 Energy’s Snapdragon 778G 5G (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. Both chips are built on a 6nm process, but the Dimensity 1300’s architecture provides a performance uplift. The K10 Energy’s Snapdragon 778G is still a capable performer, but the Nord 2T is geared towards more demanding users. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR4X RAM, but the Nord 2T’s faster processor will benefit more from efficient memory access.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging, with PD support, can replenish the battery from 0-100% in a fraction of the time compared to the Oppo K10 Energy’s 30W wired charging. This is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The K10 Energy also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Nord 2T, allowing it to charge accessories like earbuds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 Energy if you need a phone that balances performance with efficiency, and value a stable, well-optimized software experience. It’s ideal for everyday tasks, moderate gaming, and users who don’t want to be tethered to a charger constantly. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding games and applications, and absolutely need the fastest possible charging speeds. It’s the better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves running low on battery.