The Oppo K10 5G (China) and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim for a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipset choices. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for various user needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Oppo K10 5G with its Dimensity 8000 Max is the clear winner. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers a respectable experience with its Snapdragon 695, coupled with slightly faster initial charging speeds, making it a viable option for less demanding users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | PGJM10 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Significantly more powerful processor for gaming and demanding tasks
- More efficient 5nm process node for better thermal management
- Superior ISP for improved image quality
- Slower initial charging speed compared to Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G
- Potentially higher power consumption under heavy load
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster initial charging speed (50% in 15 minutes)
- More power-efficient chipset for longer battery life during light use
- Potentially lower price point
- Noticeably weaker processor for gaming and demanding applications
- Less advanced ISP resulting in lower image quality
Display Comparison
While display specifications are not provided, both phones likely feature AMOLED panels given the market segment. However, the core difference lies beneath the surface. The chipset's power draw impacts the display's ability to sustain peak brightness. The Dimensity 8000 Max in the Oppo K10 5G, being more powerful, can likely drive a brighter panel for longer periods. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G's Snapdragon 695, being more power-efficient, might prioritize battery life over sustained peak brightness. Bezels and color accuracy are assumed to be comparable without further data.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role. The Dimensity 8000 Max’s ISP is significantly more advanced than the Snapdragon 695’s, enabling faster image processing, better noise reduction, and improved dynamic range. This translates to superior image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the Oppo K10 5G will likely extract more detail and clarity from its sensors due to the superior ISP.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Oppo K10 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8000 Max boasts a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core with 4x2.75 GHz cores – compared to the Snapdragon 695’s 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8000 Max also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. This benefits gamers and power users who demand consistent performance. The Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games at higher settings.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 67W wired charging, but their charging curves differ. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G claims 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes, while the Oppo K10 5G reaches 80% in 29 minutes. This suggests the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G charges faster initially, but the Oppo K10 5G might maintain a higher charging rate for a longer duration. The actual battery life will depend on the battery capacity (not provided) and the power efficiency of the respective chipsets. The Dimensity 8000 Max, despite its higher performance, benefits from the 5nm process, potentially mitigating some of the power consumption concerns.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games and applications with ease, and value long-term performance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize a balanced experience with a focus on efficient power usage and quicker initial charging, and your usage is primarily focused on everyday tasks and casual gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not ideally suited for demanding games like Genshin Impact. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates, and even then, expect some stuttering. The Oppo K10 5G's Dimensity 8000 Max will provide a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much of a difference will the 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8000 Max make in real-world usage?
The 5nm process node translates to improved power efficiency and reduced heat generation. This means the Oppo K10 5G can sustain peak performance for longer periods without throttling, and potentially offer slightly better battery life during demanding tasks like gaming or video editing. While the difference isn't massive, it's noticeable compared to the 6nm Snapdragon 695.
❓ Does the Oppo K10 5G support reverse wireless charging?
The provided data indicates the Oppo K10 5G supports reverse *wired* charging, but doesn't mention wireless reverse charging. This allows you to use the phone as a power bank to charge other devices via a cable.
