The Oppo K10 5G (China) and Xiaomi Poco X4 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. Both devices leverage MediaTek’s Dimensity series, but with different chips – the Dimensity 8000 Max and the Dimensity 8100 respectively – and target slightly different user priorities. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT emerges as the stronger choice. While both phones offer 67W charging, the Dimensity 8100’s superior CPU performance and comparable battery life, coupled with a measured 600 nits of brightness, provide a more well-rounded experience. The K10 5G remains a strong contender, but the X4 GT’s edge in processing power is significant.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, June 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, June 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 650 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9 (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5080 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Blue, Silver |
| Models | PGJM10 | 22041216G, 22041216UG |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.92 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1190:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 747871 (v9)
GeekBench: 3719 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Faster initial charging (0-80% in 29 mins)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Potentially lower price (China market)
- Less powerful CPU (Dimensity 8000 Max)
- China-specific model – import challenges
- Display brightness data unavailable
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
- More powerful CPU (Dimensity 8100)
- Brighter display (600 nits measured)
- Globally available with established support
- Slightly slower full charge time (46 mins)
- No reverse wired charging
- Similar battery endurance to K10 5G
Display Comparison
Both the Oppo K10 5G and Poco X4 GT share a contrast ratio of 1190:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Poco X4 GT boasts a measured peak brightness of 600 nits, which will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the K10 5G, where brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the X4 GT’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage for outdoor use. We expect both to have a 120Hz refresh rate, common for this segment, but this is unconfirmed for the K10 5G.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics on megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or optical image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. However, the presence of a dedicated camera section suggests both phones aim to provide a versatile photography experience. We can assume both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. Ignoring the likely inclusion of low-resolution 2MP macro cameras on both devices, the primary sensor quality will be the deciding factor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 GT’s Dimensity 8100 (5nm) features a more powerful CPU configuration with 4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, compared to the Oppo K10 5G’s Dimensity 8000 Max (5nm) with 4x2.75 GHz cores and unspecified lower-clocked efficiency cores. This translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the X4 GT in CPU-intensive tasks like video editing and demanding games. Both utilize a 5nm process, offering good efficiency, but the architectural improvements in the 8100 give it the edge. Both are expected to pair with ample RAM, likely LPDDR5, but specific speeds are not provided.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo K10 5G and Xiaomi Poco X4 GT share an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds differ slightly. The Poco X4 GT takes 46 minutes to reach 100% with its 67W wired charging, while the K10 5G achieves 80% in 29 minutes. The K10 5G also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the X4 GT’s specifications. Despite the faster initial charge of the K10 5G, the X4 GT’s full charge time isn’t significantly slower, and the comparable endurance ratings suggest similar real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with importing a China-specific model. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 GT if you prefer a readily available device with demonstrably faster CPU performance, a brighter display, and a more established global support network. The X4 GT is the better option for gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 8100 in the Poco X4 GT significantly better for gaming than the Dimensity 8000 Max in the Oppo K10 5G?
Yes, the Dimensity 8100’s more powerful CPU and GPU architecture provide a noticeable advantage in gaming performance. Expect higher and more stable frame rates in demanding titles, and better overall responsiveness. While both chips are capable, the 8100 offers a smoother gaming experience.
❓ Does the Oppo K10 5G's faster initial charging speed (0-80%) make a real-world difference compared to the Poco X4 GT?
While the K10 5G charges to 80% faster, the Poco X4 GT’s full charge time isn’t drastically longer. For most users, the convenience of a full charge in 46 minutes is sufficient, and the difference in the initial charging phase is unlikely to be a major factor.
❓ Given that both phones have similar battery endurance, should I prioritize the Poco X4 GT for its brighter display?
Absolutely. A brighter display significantly improves usability in outdoor environments and provides a more enjoyable viewing experience overall. Since battery life is comparable, the X4 GT’s brighter screen is a worthwhile upgrade.
