The Oppo K10 5G (China) and vivo iQOO Neo 6 represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. The K10 5G leverages the newer Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max, while the iQOO Neo 6 relies on the established Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best balance of performance, battery life, and value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Oppo K10 5G (China) emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8000 Max chipset delivers superior performance, and 67W charging is competitive. However, the iQOO Neo 6’s 80W charging and proven stability remain strong contenders.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, May 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 163 x 76.2 x 8.5 mm (6.42 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, Funtouch 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 116˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min
Reverse wired | 80W wired, 50% in 12 min, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Dark Nova, Cyber Rage |
| Models | PGJM10 | I2126 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 360 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.0 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 627246 (v8), 730223 (v9)
GeekBench: 3076 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- More powerful Dimensity 8000 Max chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Competitive 67W fast charging
- Charging speed slightly slower than iQOO Neo 6
- Camera specifications unknown
vivo iQOO Neo 6
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance and stability
- Bright 772 nit display
- Older 7nm process node
- Less powerful CPU compared to Dimensity 8000 Max
Display Comparison
The iQOO Neo 6 boasts a measured peak brightness of 772 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the Oppo K10 5G’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect a similar brightness level given its market positioning. Both displays feature an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests a standard 120Hz refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life during prolonged use compared to adaptive refresh rate displays.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the iQOO Neo 6’s focus on gaming and multimedia, it’s likely to have a more refined camera system with better image processing algorithms. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses in this segment suggests both phones may include one, but their utility is limited compared to a dedicated main sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5nm) is architecturally superior to the iQOO Neo 6’s Snapdragon 870 (7nm). The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8000 Max translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, potentially leading to less throttling under sustained load. The Dimensity 8000 Max’s octa-core configuration (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) promises higher peak clock speeds compared to the Snapdragon 870’s (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585). This difference will be most noticeable in CPU-intensive tasks and demanding games. The iQOO Neo 6 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and driver support, which can mitigate some of the architectural disadvantages.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 97 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The iQOO Neo 6’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster, reaching 50% in 12 minutes and 100% in 32 minutes, compared to the Oppo K10 5G’s 67W charging (2-80% in 29 minutes). While the K10 5G’s charging time to 80% is competitive, the iQOO Neo 6’s full charge time is considerably quicker, offering a convenience advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you need maximum processing power for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and want a phone with a more modern chipset. Buy the vivo iQOO Neo 6 if you prioritize consistently stable performance, faster charging speeds (80W vs 67W), and a device with a proven track record in the gaming community.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8000 Max in the Oppo K10 5G overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8000 Max’s 5nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the Snapdragon 870’s 7nm node. While throttling is always possible, the K10 5G is likely to maintain higher sustained performance during long gaming sessions, assuming adequate cooling solutions are implemented.
❓ Is the 80W charging on the iQOO Neo 6 significantly faster in real-world use than the 67W on the Oppo K10 5G?
Yes, the iQOO Neo 6’s 80W charging offers a noticeable advantage. Reaching 100% charge in 32 minutes is considerably faster than the Oppo K10 5G’s 29 minutes to 80%, making it ideal for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the iQOO Neo 6 support high frame rates (90fps or higher) in popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 870 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high frame rates, typically 60fps or 90fps depending on the graphics settings. The iQOO Neo 6’s gaming-focused software optimizations likely enhance this capability, providing a smooth and responsive gaming experience.
