Oppo K10 5G (China) vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G: A Performance and Value Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8000 Max chipset significantly outperforms the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G. While the A53 offers a brighter display and Samsung’s software ecosystem, the K10’s speed advantage is too substantial to ignore for demanding users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 5G (China) | Samsung Galaxy A53 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | PGJM10 | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 290 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9) GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8000 Max)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Display specifications unknown
- Camera details lacking
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Bright 830 nit display
- Well-established Samsung software ecosystem
- Consistent camera performance
- Slower processor (Exynos 1280)
- Slower 25W charging
- Potential for throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 830 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Oppo K10 5G’s display specifications are not provided, Samsung’s panel offers an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks. However, without knowing the K10’s brightness, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner based on display quality alone. The A53’s Super AMOLED technology is known for vibrant colors, but the K10 may compensate with a higher refresh rate (spec not provided), which would benefit scrolling and gaming.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Oppo K10 5G. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s camera system is likely to rely on software processing to enhance image quality. Without knowing the main sensor resolution or aperture of the K10, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The A53’s image processing is generally tuned for vibrant, social media-friendly results, while the K10’s approach remains unknown. It’s safe to assume the A53 will offer a more refined and consistent camera experience, but the K10 could potentially deliver superior results with a larger sensor and optimized software.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 5G (China) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5nm), featuring an octa-core CPU with four cores clocked at a substantial 2.75 GHz. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm), which has a more conservative octa-core configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 8000 Max’s higher clock speeds and more powerful core configuration translate to significantly faster processing speeds, particularly in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The 5nm fabrication process on both chips offers good efficiency, but the architectural advantages of the Dimensity 8000 Max will likely result in superior sustained performance and less thermal throttling.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ dramatically. The Oppo K10 5G (China) supports 67W wired charging, capable of charging from 2-80% in just 29 minutes. The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is limited to 25W wired charging, which will take considerably longer to fully replenish the battery. This faster charging capability gives the K10 a significant advantage for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you need a phone for gaming, heavy multitasking, or content creation, and value rapid 67W charging. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a more polished software experience, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a brand with a strong track record for software updates, even if it means sacrificing some raw performance.