Oppo K10 5G (China) vs Realme GT Neo 3T: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is the superior choice, thanks to its Dimensity 8000 Max chipset. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T offers a more balanced package with its 80W charging and proven performance, making it ideal for those who value speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 5G (China) | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min Reverse wired | 80W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | PGJM10 | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- More powerful Dimensity 8000 Max chipset
- 5nm process for better efficiency
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower charging speed (67W vs 80W)
- Display specifications are unknown
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Faster 80W wired charging
- Higher peak display brightness (803 nits)
- Proven Snapdragon 870 performance
- Less powerful chipset compared to Dimensity 8000 Max
- 7nm process is less efficient
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a measured peak brightness of 803 nits, a respectable figure ensuring good visibility outdoors. While the Oppo K10 5G’s display specifications are not provided, Realme’s display benefits from an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, contributing to vibrant visuals. The lack of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching to conserve battery, but the GT Neo 3T’s higher peak brightness gives it an edge in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both will feature a primary sensor capable of producing good quality images in favorable lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing feature with limited practical utility. Image processing styles will likely differ, with Oppo traditionally favoring more vibrant colors and Realme leaning towards a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max, built on a 5nm process, offers a significant architectural advantage over the Realme GT Neo 3T’s 7nm Snapdragon 870. The Dimensity 8000 Max features a more modern CPU configuration (4x2.75 GHz + 4xX.X GHz) compared to the Snapdragon 870’s (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 + 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 + 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585). This translates to superior multi-core performance and improved efficiency. While the Snapdragon 870 remains a capable performer, the 5nm node of the Dimensity 8000 Max inherently provides better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The K10 5G is likely to excel in CPU-intensive tasks and graphically demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite differing charging speeds. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging is significantly faster than the Oppo K10 5G’s 67W charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 29 minutes. This faster charging is a major convenience factor. While the K10 5G offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent in the GT Neo 3T, the speed advantage of the GT Neo 3T’s charging is likely more impactful for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you need maximum CPU and GPU performance for demanding games and applications, and are willing to potentially trade off slightly slower charging speeds. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prefer a phone that charges incredibly quickly (80W) and offers a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, prioritizing convenience over absolute peak performance.