Smartphones have evolved dramatically. This comparison pits a modern powerhouse, the Oppo K10 5G, against a phone from a bygone era, the Oppo A57 (2016). We'll break down the key differences to help you understand just how far mobile technology has come.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo K10 5G utterly dominates the Oppo A57 in virtually every category. Its 5G connectivity, vastly superior chipset, faster charging, and improved camera make it the clear winner for anyone seeking a modern smartphone experience. The A57's only advantage is potentially lower initial cost, if found.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2016, November. Released 2016, December |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 4), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 149.1 x 72.9 x 7.7 mm (5.87 x 2.87 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 147 g (5.19 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 4 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.2 inches, 74.5 cm2 (~68.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8940 Snapdragon 435 (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 505 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 6 (Marshmallow), ColorOS 3 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min
Reverse wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 2900 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Gold, Rose Gold |
| Models | PGJM10 | CPH1701, A57 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Powerful Dimensity 8000 Max chipset
- 5G Connectivity
- 67W Fast Charging
- Modern Display (likely AMOLED)
- Improved Camera System
- Potentially higher price than older devices
- May lack some niche features of older phones
Oppo A57 (2016)
- Lower initial cost (potentially)
- Compact size (likely)
- Simple and easy to use
- Outdated chipset
- Poor performance
- Low-resolution display
- Basic camera
- No 5G
Display Comparison
The Oppo K10 5G likely features a modern AMOLED display with a high refresh rate (90Hz or 120Hz), offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Oppo A57 (2016) has a standard LCD display, likely with a lower resolution and refresh rate, resulting in a less visually appealing experience. Expect better brightness and outdoor visibility on the K10 5G.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo K10 5G boasts a significantly more advanced camera system, likely with higher resolution sensors, improved image processing, and features like optical image stabilization (OIS). The A57's camera is basic and produces noticeably lower-quality images, especially in low light.
Performance
The Dimensity 8000 Max in the Oppo K10 5G is a significant leap over the Snapdragon 435. Expect drastically faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and the ability to handle demanding games with ease. The A57 struggles with modern apps and multitasking.
Battery Life
While the A57 might have a similar battery capacity, the K10 5G's efficient chipset and 67W fast charging provide a much better overall battery experience. The K10 5G will likely offer longer real-world battery life and charge significantly faster.
Buying Guide
The Oppo K10 5G is for users wanting a modern, fast, and feature-rich smartphone with 5G capabilities. The Oppo A57 (2016) is only suitable for users needing a basic, ultra-budget phone for calls and very light usage, or those seeking a nostalgic device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oppo A57 (2016) still usable in 2024?
It can handle basic tasks like calls and texting, but its outdated hardware struggles with modern apps and software. Performance will be slow and frustrating.
❓ Why is the Oppo K10 5G so much better?
The K10 5G utilizes a modern chipset, 5G connectivity, and advanced features that were simply unavailable in 2016. It represents a significant advancement in smartphone technology.
