Oppo K10 5G (China) vs OnePlus Nord 2T: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and faster charging, the Oppo K10 5G (China) emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8000 Max chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage. However, the OnePlus Nord 2T provides a more polished software experience and comparable battery endurance, making it a strong contender for those valuing overall refinement.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo K10 5G (China) | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min Reverse wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | PGJM10 | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- More powerful Dimensity 8000 Max chipset
- Faster charging speeds (67W)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Limited information on camera specifications
- Software experience may not be as refined as OxygenOS
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Brighter display (636 nits)
- Refined OxygenOS software experience
- Balanced performance with Dimensity 1300
- Slightly less powerful chipset compared to K10 5G
- Charging speed is slower than K10 5G
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a display capable of reaching 636 nits of peak brightness, a figure measured in our testing, ensuring excellent visibility even outdoors. While the Oppo K10 5G’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to expect a similar level of brightness given its market positioning. Both devices feature an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels. The Nord 2T’s measured brightness is a key advantage for users who frequently consume content in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Oppo K10 5G. The Nord 2T’s camera system is likely to benefit from OnePlus’s established image processing algorithms. Without specific details on the K10 5G’s sensor size and aperture, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both devices is largely a marketing feature, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo K10 5G (China) utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max, fabricated on a 5nm process, while the Nord 2T features the Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm node. The 5nm process generally translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing the K10 5G to sustain peak performance for longer periods. The K10 5G’s CPU configuration (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) suggests a focus on high clock speeds, while the Nord 2T’s (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) utilizes a tri-cluster approach with more powerful Cortex-A78 cores. This suggests the Nord 2T may excel in multi-threaded tasks, but the K10 5G will likely dominate single-core performance.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo K10 5G and the OnePlus Nord 2T achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, their charging speeds differ significantly. The Nord 2T supports 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD, while the K10 5G boasts 67W wired charging. Oppo claims a 2-80% charge in just 29 minutes for the K10 5G, while the Nord 2T’s 80W charging should be slightly faster. The K10 5G also offers reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding games and applications, and value the fastest possible charging speeds. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prefer a more refined user experience with OxygenOS, a consistently bright display, and a balanced feature set that prioritizes usability over raw specs.