The Oppo K10 5G (China) and Honor X9 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. However, they take drastically different approaches to achieving affordability. The K10 5G leverages a flagship-adjacent Dimensity 8000 Max chipset, while the X9 5G opts for the more mainstream Snapdragon 695. This comparison dissects these choices, revealing which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo K10 5G (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8000 Max offers a significant leap in processing power over the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9 5G. While both offer fast charging, the K10’s superior chipset justifies its potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, April 24 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, April 30 | Available. Released 2022, March 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | 166.1 x 75.8 x 8.1 mm (6.54 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.3 cm2 (~89.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 | Android 11, Magic UI 4.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 3.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.1, 26mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (closed type) | Yes |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | - |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 67W wired, 2-80% in 29 min
Reverse wired | 66W wired, 81% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Titanium Silver, Ocean Blue, Midnight Black |
| Models | PGJM10 | ANY-NX1 |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 240 EUR |
Oppo K10 5G (China)
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 8000 Max chipset
- Potentially better thermal management due to 5nm process
- Faster charging speeds (marginally)
- May be more expensive
- Potentially higher power consumption
Honor X9 5G
- Likely more affordable
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Fast 66W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- May struggle with demanding games and applications
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the K10 5G's focus on performance, it's reasonable to expect a higher refresh rate panel. The Honor X9 5G, positioned as a more value-oriented device, may prioritize cost savings in this area. Color accuracy and peak brightness will likely be similar, but the K10 5G has the potential for a more visually fluid experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a definitive comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the K10 5G will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The K10 5G is more likely to support advanced features like 4K video recording at higher frame rates. The Honor X9 5G will likely focus on providing acceptable image quality for social media and casual photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 8000 Max (5nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Honor X9 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm). The Dimensity 8000 Max features a more powerful CPU configuration – octa-core (4x2.75 GHz & 4xX.X GHz) versus the Snapdragon 695’s octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver). The 5nm process node of the Dimensity 8000 Max also translates to better power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance during prolonged gaming or demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday use, but will struggle with graphically intensive applications compared to the K10 5G.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 66-67W wired charging, with the Oppo K10 5G achieving 80% charge in 29 minutes and the Honor X9 5G reaching 81% in 30 minutes. This indicates comparable charging speeds. While battery capacity isn't specified, the more power-hungry Dimensity 8000 Max in the K10 5G may necessitate a larger battery to achieve similar battery life to the X9 5G. The efficiency gains from the 5nm process could mitigate this, but real-world testing would be needed to confirm.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo K10 5G (China) if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, intensive multitasking, and benefit from a more powerful processor for future software updates. Buy the Honor X9 5G if you prioritize a balanced experience with reliable performance for everyday tasks, and potentially a lower price point, accepting a compromise in peak performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8000 Max in the Oppo K10 5G overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8000 Max's 5nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to older chipsets. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the K10 5G should be better equipped to manage it than devices with less efficient processors. However, sustained peak performance will still depend on the phone's cooling system, which isn't specified.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9 5G sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming-focused chipset, so don't expect the same level of performance as phones with more powerful processors like the Dimensity 8000 Max.
❓ Does the Oppo K10 5G support faster charging than the Honor X9 5G in real-world usage?
While the Oppo K10 5G claims to reach 80% in 29 minutes versus the Honor X9 5G's 30 minutes for 81%, the difference is minimal. Real-world charging times can vary based on battery temperature and other factors. Both phones offer very competitive charging speeds.
