The Oppo Find represents an older generation of mobile technology, while the Xiaomi 13T arrives as a modern mid-range contender. This comparison isn't about a direct fight between equals; it's about understanding the advancements made in smartphone hardware over the years and whether the 13T's improvements justify its position in today's market.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the vast majority of users, the Xiaomi 13T is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset delivers vastly superior performance, coupled with exceptional battery life and fast 67W charging. The Oppo Find, with its dated dual-core Krait processor, struggles to compete in modern workloads.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2012, June. Released 2012, July | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 125 x 66 x 6.7 mm (4.92 x 2.60 x 0.26 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Micro-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 125 g (4.41 oz) | 193 g or 197 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~217 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 4.3 inches, 52.6 cm2 (~63.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | - | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 4.0.4 (Ice Cream Sandwich) | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps (HDR10+), 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 1.3 MP | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0, A2DP | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 42 min |
| Stand-by | Up to 400 h (2G) / Up to 350 h (3G) | - |
| Talk time | Up to 9 h 20 min (2G) / Up to 7 h 30 min (3G) | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 1500 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | - | 2306EPN60G |
| Price | About 100 EUR | $ 255.96 / £ 326.27 / € 204.18 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find
- Extremely low cost (likely)
- Minimalist software experience (potentially)
- Compact size (potentially)
- Severely outdated processor
- Poor performance in modern apps
- Inferior camera quality
- Short battery life
Xiaomi 13T
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset
- Excellent battery life (12:23h active use)
- Fast 67W charging
- Bright and modern display
- May be more expensive than the Oppo Find
- Software experience may include bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
- Larger size compared to potentially older, smaller phones
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1264 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Oppo Find, which lacks any specified brightness data. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the 13T's brightness suggests a more modern IPS or AMOLED panel. The Oppo Find's display, given its age, likely suffers from narrower viewing angles and less accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
The context data only indicates 'Photo / Video' capability for the Oppo Find, offering no specifics. The Xiaomi 13T, while details are limited, benefits from a modern image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 8200 Ultra. This translates to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Oppo Find, it's safe to assume its camera performance is significantly inferior to what the 13T can achieve, even with a similarly sized sensor.
Performance
The performance gap is immense. The Oppo Find's dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait processor is dwarfed by the Xiaomi 13T's Octa-core Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultra (4 nm). The Dimensity 8200 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, offers a substantial increase in both CPU and GPU performance, alongside improved power efficiency. The 13T’s CPU configuration – a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core, three 3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – provides a balanced approach to handling demanding tasks. The Krait architecture in the Oppo Find is simply too old to handle modern applications and games smoothly.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T excels in battery performance. Its active use score of 12:23h and endurance rating of 101h demonstrate exceptional longevity. The 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support allows for a full charge in just 42 minutes, a massive convenience. The Oppo Find's battery capacity is unknown, but given its older hardware and less efficient processor, it's highly unlikely to match the 13T's endurance. The charging speed is also expected to be considerably slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find if you absolutely require a minimal, basic smartphone for essential communication and have a very limited budget. It's a device for those prioritizing cost above all else. Buy the Xiaomi 13T if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, photography, and demand all-day battery life with rapid charging. It's the choice for users who want a capable and modern smartphone experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Xiaomi 13T's Dimensity 8200 Ultra chipset capable of handling demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Dimensity 8200 Ultra is a powerful chipset that can comfortably run Genshin Impact at high settings. The 4nm process and efficient core configuration contribute to sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling, allowing for extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the Xiaomi 13T's charging speed compare to other phones in its price range?
The 67W wired charging on the Xiaomi 13T is exceptionally fast for its price range. It can charge the phone from 0% to 100% in approximately 42 minutes, which is significantly quicker than many competitors offering 33W or 25W charging.
❓ Given the Oppo Find's age, are there any software update concerns?
Yes, the Oppo Find is likely no longer receiving software updates, including security patches. This poses a significant security risk and limits access to new features and app compatibility. The Xiaomi 13T, being a newer device, will continue to receive updates for a longer period.
❓ Would the Oppo Find be suitable for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light web browsing?
While the Oppo Find *can* handle basic tasks, its outdated processor will result in a sluggish and frustrating experience even for simple operations. The Xiaomi 13T provides a much smoother and more responsive experience for all tasks, even basic ones.
