Oppo Find X9+ vs Xiaomi 13 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 13 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, coupled with a proven 120W charging system and excellent battery endurance, offers a more consistently smooth experience. However, the Oppo Find X9+’s Dimensity 9500 holds promise for peak performance enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X9+ | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+ | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.4", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 12W PD, 33W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7025 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | - | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | - | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X9+
- Potentially superior CPU performance with the Dimensity 9500
- Cutting-edge 3nm fabrication process for improved efficiency
- Versatile charging options (wired, wireless, reverse wireless)
- Lack of battery life data raises concerns about endurance
- Uncertainty regarding camera performance without detailed specs
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Excellent battery life (10:55h active use, 115h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging (0-100% in 19 minutes)
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance and thermal management
- 4nm process is less advanced than the X9+'s 3nm
- Wireless charging is slower than the Oppo Find X9+
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1253 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable display even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo Find X9+’s display specifications are absent, Oppo typically employs high-quality panels. The Xiaomi’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) indicates a true black level, enhancing visual depth. Without PWM frequency data for the X9+, it’s difficult to assess potential eye strain concerns, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s display is likely to be a strong performer for most users.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are advertised as having exceptional photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Sensor size and aperture information are crucial for determining low-light performance. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s camera system is known for its color science and dynamic range. Without knowing the Oppo Find X9+’s camera specs, it’s difficult to assess its capabilities, but Oppo has a strong track record in mobile photography. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device hinders a complete assessment.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X9+’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, built on a 3nm process, theoretically offers superior power efficiency and transistor density compared to the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm). The Dimensity 9500’s CPU configuration – a 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core alongside C1-Premium and C1-Pro cores – suggests a focus on maximizing single-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 core at 3.2 GHz is also highly capable. The Snapdragon’s established software optimization and thermal management are likely to provide more consistent performance under sustained loads. The absence of RAM specifications for the X9+ makes a direct comparison difficult, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro shines in battery performance, achieving an endurance rating of 115 hours and a real-world active use score of 10:55h. Its 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, fully charging the device in just 19 minutes. The Oppo Find X9+ offers a more varied charging ecosystem with 80W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless, but the lack of endurance data makes it difficult to gauge its overall battery life. While 50W wireless charging is respectable, the Xiaomi’s faster wired charging is a clear benefit for users who need a quick top-up.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X9+ if you demand the absolute latest in mobile silicon and are willing to potentially trade some battery consistency for peak CPU performance. This phone is for the power user who frequently engages in demanding tasks like video editing or high-end gaming. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you prioritize a balanced experience with exceptional battery life, incredibly fast charging (reaching 100% in just 19 minutes), and a well-rounded camera system. It’s the ideal choice for users who want a flagship that consistently delivers without compromise.