Oppo Find X9+ vs Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a balance of performance, camera capabilities, and fast charging, the Oppo Find X9+ emerges as the winner. Its newer Dimensity 9500 chipset and comprehensive charging options offer a compelling package. However, dedicated gamers will still find the ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s specialized features and optimized cooling superior.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X9+ | Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2023, April 13 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | - | 173 x 77 x 10.3 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 239 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | Built-in motorized cooling air vent (AeroActive Portal) IP54 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+ | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.4", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| - | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 12W PD, 33W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7025 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Storm White |
| Price | - | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1325105 (v9) GeekBench: 5139 (v5.5), 5567 (v6) GFXBench: 107fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X9+
- Faster charging speeds (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially superior processor (Dimensity 9500 3nm)
- More versatile charging options (reverse wireless)
- Camera specs currently unknown
- Thermal management needs to be proven
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
- Optimized for gaming with advanced cooling
- High peak display brightness (1095 nits)
- Established Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Slower charging speeds (65W wired)
- Less versatile charging options
- Gaming-focused design may not appeal to all
Display Comparison
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate boasts a measured peak brightness of 1095 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Find X9+’s display specs are currently unknown, Oppo typically employs high-quality panels. The ROG Phone’s infinite contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED displays, provides deep blacks and vibrant colors. The ROG Phone’s 165Hz refresh rate (likely) will provide a smoother gaming experience than a standard 120Hz panel, assuming the Find X9+ doesn’t match it. The ROG Phone’s display is geared towards responsiveness, while the Find X9+ will likely focus on color accuracy and overall viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but their approaches differ. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate prioritizes versatility with photo and video capabilities, while the Find X9+ is expected to emphasize image quality and computational photography. Without specific sensor details for the Find X9+, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, Oppo’s history suggests a focus on larger sensors and advanced image processing algorithms. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s camera performance is solid, but it’s not its primary selling point. The Find X9+ is likely to excel in low-light photography and dynamic range.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X9+’s Mediatek Dimensity 9500, fabricated on a 3nm process, promises significant gains in both performance and efficiency compared to the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s 4nm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. The Dimensity 9500’s octa-core configuration, with its C1-Ultra core clocked at 4.21 GHz, suggests a focus on peak performance. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Cortex-X3 core and optimized architecture are well-established. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate benefits from Asus’s advanced cooling system, mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Find X9+ will need to demonstrate effective thermal management to fully leverage the Dimensity 9500’s potential. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will impact real-world performance.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, their charging capabilities diverge significantly. The Oppo Find X9+ supports an impressive 80W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and even 10W reverse wireless charging. The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate offers 65W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC5 support, taking 42 minutes to reach 100%, and 10W reverse wired charging. The Find X9+’s faster wired and wireless charging speeds provide a more convenient user experience, especially for users who frequently top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X9+ if you need a versatile flagship with exceptional charging speeds, a potentially superior processor, and a well-rounded camera system. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate if you prioritize uncompromising gaming performance, sustained high frame rates, and a feature set tailored specifically for mobile esports, even if it means sacrificing some camera versatility and charging speed.