Oppo Find X9+ vs iPhone 14 Pro Max: A Head-to-Head Battle of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a seamless ecosystem and consistently excellent camera performance, the iPhone 14 Pro Max remains the safer bet. However, the Oppo Find X9+ offers a compelling alternative with its potentially superior processing power and significantly faster charging, appealing to power users and Android enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X9+ | Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66 - A2894, A2896 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2894, A2896 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A2895 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Not announced yet | 2022, September 07 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2022, September 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, stainless steel frame |
| Dimensions | - | 160.7 x 77.6 x 7.9 mm (6.33 x 3.06 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) |
| Weight | - | 240 g (8.47 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 6m for 30 min) Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Ceramic Shield glass |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1290 x 2796 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+ | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 2000 nits (HBM) |
| - | Always-On display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Hexa-core (2x3.46 GHz Everest + 4x2.02 GHz Sawtooth) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) |
| OS | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | iOS 16, upgradable to iOS 26.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 512GB 6GB RAM, 1TB 6GB RAM |
| - | NVMe | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", PDAF, OIS (unconfirmed) SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.4", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 77mm (telephoto), 1/3.5", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, stereo sound rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF | 12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support Emergency SOS via satellite (SMS sending/receiving) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 12W PD, 33W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | Wired, PD2.0, 50% in 30 min 15W wireless (MagSafe) 15W wireless (Qi2) - requires iOS 17.2 update |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7025 mAh | Li-Ion 4323 mAh (16.68 Wh) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Space Black, Silver, Gold, Deep Purple |
| Models | - | A2894, A2651, A2893, A2895, A2896, iphone15,3 |
| Price | - | € 530.79 / $ 489.81 / £ 446.75 |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.07 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.98 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 955884 (v9) GeekBench: 5423 (v5.1) GFXBench: 54fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X9+
- Significantly faster charging (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially superior processing power with Dimensity 9500 (3nm)
- Android OS offers greater customization options
- Camera specs are currently unknown, making a direct comparison difficult
- Long-term software support may be less extensive than Apple
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max
- Excellent and consistent camera performance
- Seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem
- Long-term software support and updates
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo Find X9+
- Less customization options with iOS
Display Comparison
The iPhone 14 Pro Max boasts a measured peak brightness of 1760 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Oppo Find X9+'s display specifications are not provided, it's reasonable to expect a comparable OLED panel. The iPhone’s infinite contrast ratio, typical of OLED technology, delivers deep blacks and vibrant colors. The lack of PWM frequency data for the Oppo makes it difficult to assess potential flicker-related eye strain, a factor where Apple typically excels. The iPhone’s ProMotion technology (adaptive refresh rate) is also absent from the provided Oppo specs, potentially impacting smoothness during scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are described as having capable photo and video capabilities, but specific details are lacking for the Oppo Find X9+. The iPhone 14 Pro Max is known for its excellent image processing, delivering consistent results across various lighting conditions. Sensor size and lens aperture data are crucial for assessing low-light performance, but are currently unavailable for the Oppo. Apple’s sensor-shift OIS is a proven technology for stabilizing video and improving image clarity. Without detailed camera specs for the Oppo, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison beyond acknowledging both phones target a premium camera experience.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 9500 in the Oppo Find X9+ utilizes a 3nm process, a generation ahead of the Apple A16 Bionic’s 4nm node. This smaller process theoretically translates to improved power efficiency and higher transistor density. The Dimensity 9500’s octa-core configuration, with its tiered CPU cores (4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 2.7 GHz C1-Pro), suggests a focus on sustained performance under heavy load. The A16 Bionic’s hexa-core design (2x3.46 GHz Everest + 4x2.02 GHz Sawtooth) prioritizes efficiency and responsiveness. While raw clock speeds favor the Oppo, Apple’s chip design and software optimization often deliver superior real-world performance despite lower clock speeds. The Oppo’s LPDDR5x RAM (speculation based on flagship positioning) should provide ample bandwidth, but Apple’s memory controller is renowned for its efficiency.
Battery Life
Both the Oppo Find X9+ and the iPhone 14 Pro Max achieve an endurance rating of 121 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite potentially different battery capacities. However, the charging capabilities are drastically different. The Oppo Find X9+ supports 80W wired charging, capable of a full charge in under 30 minutes, alongside 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless. The iPhone 14 Pro Max offers slower wired charging (PD2.0, 50% in 30 min) and 15W wireless charging (MagSafe/Qi2). The Oppo’s charging speed is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X9+ if you need the absolute fastest charging speeds available, prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks, and prefer the flexibility of the Android operating system. Buy the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max if you value a polished, integrated ecosystem, consistently high-quality camera results with minimal effort, and long-term software support.