Oppo Find X9 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around excellence and a refined ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its superior battery life (13:49h active use) and consistently excellent camera performance outweigh the Find X9’s potentially faster peak CPU speeds. However, the Find X9’s charging capabilities are a significant draw for those prioritizing speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X9 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, China | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 16 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 22 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 157 x 73.9 x 8 mm (6.18 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80W UFCS, 55W PPS, 11.7W PD 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7025 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Titanium Grey, Velvet Red, White | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | CPH2797, PLJ110 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | $ 1,065.94 / £ 949.99 | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X9
- Significantly faster charging speeds (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9500
- Cutting-edge 3nm process node for improved efficiency
- Camera specs currently unknown, potential for inconsistent performance
- Software ecosystem less mature than Samsung’s One UI
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Excellent battery life (13:49h active use)
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance and thermal management
- Refined software experience with One UI
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo Find X9
- Higher price point
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a measured peak brightness of 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Find X9’s display specs are currently unknown, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The S24 Ultra’s adaptive refresh rate (LTPO) technology likely contributes to its superior battery efficiency. The S24 Ultra’s display is also known for its color accuracy, a critical factor for content creators. Without comparable data for the Find X9, the S24 Ultra currently holds a clear advantage in display performance.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is renowned for its versatile camera system, though specific details require a full review. It’s expected to feature a high-resolution main sensor with advanced OIS and a sophisticated image processing pipeline. The Find X9’s camera specs are currently unknown, but Oppo has a history of focusing on computational photography. The key differentiator will be image processing style – Samsung typically aims for vibrant, saturated colors, while Oppo often prioritizes a more natural look. Without sensor size or aperture information for the Find X9, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance relative to the S24 Ultra.
Performance
The core of this battle lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a proven performer, featuring an 8-core architecture with a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.39GHz. The Oppo Find X9’s Dimensity 9500 (3nm) aims to surpass this with a more aggressive core configuration: 1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra, 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium, and 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro. The 3nm process node of the Dimensity 9500 *should* offer better power efficiency and potentially higher peak performance, but real-world thermal management will be crucial. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s established track record suggests better sustained performance under heavy load. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the speed and configuration will impact overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra delivers an impressive 13:49h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. It supports 45W wired charging, reaching 65% charge in 30 minutes, alongside 15W wireless charging (Qi) and 4.5W reverse wireless. The Oppo Find X9 significantly ups the ante with 80W wired charging, 80W UFCS, 55W PPS, 11.7W PD, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless. This translates to substantially faster charging times, potentially fully charging the device in under 30 minutes. However, faster charging doesn’t necessarily equate to longer battery life; the S24 Ultra’s efficiency gives it a clear edge in longevity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X9 if you need blazing-fast charging – its 80W wired and 50W wireless capabilities are unmatched. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value the latest MediaTek silicon. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a more polished software experience, a consistently reliable camera system, and all-day battery life. It’s the better choice for power users and those deeply integrated into the Samsung ecosystem.