Oppo Find X9 vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance, Camera, and Battery
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo Find X9 is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro excels in camera versatility, battery endurance, and software integration, making it the better choice for the average user seeking a balanced and polished experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X9 | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International, China | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, October 16 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, October 22 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157 x 73.9 x 8 mm (6.18 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 800 nits (typ), 1800 nits (HBM), 3600 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x4.21 GHz C1-Ultra & 3x3.5 GHz C1-Premium & 4x2.7 GHz C1-Pro) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9500 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Arm G1-Ultra | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 16, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 16 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 1.12µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision, LOG | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80W UFCS, 55W PPS, 11.7W PD 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 7025 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Black, Titanium Grey, Velvet Red, White | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | CPH2797, PLJ110 | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | $ 1,065.94 / £ 949.99 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Oppo Find X9
- Blazing-fast Dimensity 9500 processor
- Industry-leading 80W wired and wireless charging
- Potential for superior gaming performance
- Battery life potentially compromised by power-hungry processor
- Camera performance unproven against Pixel 8 Pro
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera system with Google’s AI processing
- Long-lasting battery life and efficient power management
- Seamless software experience and timely updates
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo Find X9
- Tensor G3 processor less powerful than Dimensity 9500 in raw benchmarks
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 1600 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Find X9’s display specifications are currently unknown, Oppo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The Pixel 8 Pro’s display technology is likely LTPO, enabling variable refresh rates for improved power efficiency. The Pixel 8 Pro’s brightness advantage will be noticeable in outdoor scenarios, while the Find X9 will need to match or exceed this to compete effectively.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro is renowned for its computational photography capabilities, leveraging Google’s image processing algorithms. While specific sensor details are missing for the Find X9, Oppo often focuses on high-resolution sensors. The Pixel 8 Pro’s strength lies in its software, delivering consistently excellent results across various lighting conditions. The Find X9 will need to demonstrate a significant hardware advantage, such as a larger main sensor or advanced optics, to challenge the Pixel 8 Pro’s image quality. The Pixel 8 Pro’s video capabilities are also highly regarded, benefiting from Google’s stabilization and dynamic range enhancements.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 9500 in the Oppo Find X9, fabricated on a 3nm process, is architecturally more aggressive than the Google Tensor G3’s 4nm node. The Dimensity 9500’s octa-core configuration, featuring a 4.21 GHz C1-Ultra core, suggests a focus on single-core performance, crucial for responsive UI and app loading. The Tensor G3’s nona-core setup, with a Cortex-X3, prioritizes AI tasks and machine learning. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9500 should offer better power efficiency at comparable performance levels, but the Tensor G3’s specialized cores excel in on-device AI processing. Gamers and power users will likely favor the Find X9, while Pixel users will appreciate the Tensor G3’s AI-driven features.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 8 Pro achieves an impressive 11:14h of active use and an endurance rating of 90 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Oppo Find X9 compensates with significantly faster charging speeds: 80W wired, 80W UFCS, 55W PPS, 11.7W PD, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless. The Pixel 8 Pro offers 30W wired charging and 23W wireless charging. While the Find X9’s battery capacity is unknown, its charging speed allows for a full charge in a fraction of the time compared to the Pixel 8 Pro. The Pixel 8 Pro’s ‘Bypass Charging’ feature, which reduces battery degradation, is a notable advantage for long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X9 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value the fastest wired and wireless charging available. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize a best-in-class camera system, long-lasting battery life, and seamless integration with Google’s AI-powered features, even if it means sacrificing some raw processing speed.