Oppo Find X8s+ vs Xiaomi 14 Pro: A Head-to-Head Flagship Battle
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw speed and charging convenience, the Xiaomi 14 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 120W wired charging, delivers a noticeably snappier experience and faster top-ups. However, the Oppo Find X8s+ presents a compelling alternative for those intrigued by Mediatek’s latest silicon and its potential optimizations.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8s+ | Xiaomi 14 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2023, October 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 16 | Available. Released 2023, November 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame or titanium frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 157.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.20 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 223 g or 230 g (7.87 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Shatterproof glass |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.4-f/4.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS, 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 12W PD, 33W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 18 min 50W wireless, 100% in 40 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4880 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Black, Silver, Titanium, Green |
| Models | PLB110 | 23116PN5BC |
| Price | - | About 650 EUR |
Oppo Find X8s+
- Potentially more efficient 3nm Dimensity 9400+ chipset
- May offer advanced display features like higher PWM dimming
- Innovative Mediatek image processing capabilities
- Slower 80W wired charging compared to Xiaomi
- Chipset performance is unproven against Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Software ecosystem may be less mature than Xiaomi's
Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Faster 120W wired charging for rapid top-ups
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance and efficiency
- Established software ecosystem and wider compatibility
- 4nm process may result in slightly higher thermal output
- Potentially less efficient than the 3nm Dimensity 9400+
- May lack some of the innovative display features of the Oppo
Display Comparison
While both phones are expected to feature high-quality displays, specific details are missing. However, given Xiaomi’s history, the 14 Pro likely boasts a higher peak brightness and potentially a more color-accurate panel. The Oppo Find X8s+ may focus on advanced features like a higher PWM dimming rate for reduced eye strain, appealing to users sensitive to flicker. The absence of LTPO details for either phone means power efficiency during variable refresh rate usage remains unknown.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, both manufacturers are known for their camera prowess. The Xiaomi 14 Pro is likely to feature a larger main sensor, leveraging Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for superior image processing. The Oppo Find X8s+ may focus on computational photography advancements, potentially utilizing Mediatek’s ISP to deliver unique image characteristics. The absence of information regarding OIS and lens apertures makes a definitive comparison impossible, but both phones will likely offer excellent image quality in various lighting conditions.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a known quantity, offering excellent performance and efficiency. The Oppo Find X8s+’s Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) promises even greater efficiency due to its smaller node size. However, the CPU architecture differs significantly: the Dimensity utilizes a 1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, while the Snapdragon employs a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520. This suggests the Dimensity prioritizes peak performance with its X925 core, while the Snapdragon offers a more balanced core configuration. The Snapdragon’s 4nm process may offer better sustained performance under heavy load due to superior thermal management.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 14 Pro’s 120W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a full charge in just 18 minutes. The Oppo Find X8s+’s 80W wired charging, while still fast, is considerably slower. The Xiaomi also supports PD3.0 and QC4, offering broader compatibility. Wireless charging is comparable at 50W for both, with the Xiaomi taking 40 minutes to fully charge. The 10W reverse wireless charging is identical on both devices. The difference in charging speed will be a major factor for users who prioritize convenience and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8s+ if you need a phone showcasing the latest Mediatek flagship processor and are willing to potentially trade a small amount of raw performance for a potentially more efficient thermal profile. Buy the Xiaomi 14 Pro if you prefer a proven, high-performance chipset with incredibly fast charging and a more established software ecosystem.