Oppo Find X8s vs vivo X100 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Find X8s emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400+ chipset, built on a 3nm process, offers a tangible performance advantage. However, the vivo X100 Pro’s excellent battery life and potentially more refined camera processing make it a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8s | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 16 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.8 x 7.7 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), 3.5x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 12W PD, 33W PPS 50W wireless | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White, Pink | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | PKT110 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | - | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X8s
- Latest Dimensity 9400+ chipset for superior performance
- 3nm process for improved power efficiency
- Potentially better sustained performance due to thermal advantages
- Charging speed is slower than the vivo X100 Pro
- Battery life is currently unknown
vivo X100 Pro
- Excellent battery life (13:53h active use)
- Faster 100W wired charging
- Reverse wired charging for accessories
- Older Dimensity 9300 chipset
- 4nm process is less efficient than 3nm
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1472 nits, making it ideal for outdoor visibility. While the Oppo Find X8s’ display specs are currently unknown, we anticipate it will be competitive. Both devices likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The X100 Pro’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who frequently use their phones in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are expected to deliver exceptional camera performance, but details are limited. The X100 Pro’s camera is highlighted as a key feature, suggesting a focus on image quality and video capabilities. Sensor size and lens apertures will be critical differentiators. While both likely feature advanced computational photography, the X100 Pro’s established image processing pipeline may offer a more refined experience out of the box. We’ll need detailed image samples to assess the true capabilities of each system, ignoring the inclusion of typical 2MP macro lenses.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X8s’ Dimensity 9400+ (3nm) features a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. This contrasts with the vivo X100 Pro’s Dimensity 9300 (4nm) with a single 3.25 GHz Cortex-X4, three 2.85 GHz Cortex-X4s, and four 2.0 GHz Cortex-A720s. The 3nm process of the 9400+ should yield better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance, mitigating thermal throttling. The X8s’ newer CPU architecture also suggests improvements in single-core performance. However, the X100 Pro’s 4nm node is still highly efficient, and real-world differences may be nuanced.
Battery Life
The vivo X100 Pro demonstrates a strong battery performance, achieving 13 hours and 53 minutes of active use. The Oppo Find X8s’ battery capacity is currently unknown. However, the X100 Pro’s 100W wired charging (50% in 14 minutes) is faster than the X8s’ 80W wired charging. Both support 50W wireless charging, and the X100 Pro adds reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The X100 Pro’s faster charging and proven battery life give it an edge in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8s if you demand the absolute fastest Android experience, are a power user who frequently games or edits videos, and want a phone with the latest silicon. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prioritize all-day battery life, a potentially more polished camera experience, and faster wired charging speeds, even if it means sacrificing a bit of peak CPU performance.