Oppo Find X8s vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around capability and a mature software ecosystem, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra remains the safer bet. However, the Oppo Find X8s’s Dimensity 9400+ and significantly faster charging offer compelling advantages for power users and those seeking cutting-edge hardware.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8s | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 16 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 150.6 x 71.8 x 7.7 mm (5.93 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.32 inches, 97.9 cm2 (~90.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.73 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 MC12 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.8, 85mm (telephoto), 3.5x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 12W PD, 33W PPS 50W wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White, Pink | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | PKT110 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | - | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X8s
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400+
- Significantly faster wired and wireless charging
- Likely more aggressive pricing
- Software ecosystem less mature than Samsung’s One UI
- Camera performance unproven against S24 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (13:49h active use)
- Proven camera system with versatile features
- Mature software experience with long-term support
- Slower charging speeds compared to Oppo Find X8s
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 may throttle under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a peak brightness of 1447 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Find X8s’s display specifications are currently unknown, Oppo typically employs high-quality panels. The S24 Ultra’s adaptive refresh rate (LTPO) technology likely contributes to its impressive battery efficiency. The S24 Ultra’s display is also known for its color accuracy, a critical factor for content creators. Without comparable data for the X8s, the S24 Ultra currently holds the display advantage.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is renowned for its versatile camera system, though specific details require a full review. The Find X8s’s camera specifications are currently unavailable, but Oppo has a history of delivering competitive camera performance. The S24 Ultra’s image processing prioritizes natural colors and detail, while Oppo often leans towards more vibrant, social media-friendly images. Sensor size and OIS capabilities will be key differentiators, but without concrete data on the X8s, it’s difficult to assess its camera prowess against the established S24 Ultra.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X8s utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, built on a 3nm process, featuring a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.73 GHz. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), which employs a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.39 GHz. The 3nm node of the Dimensity 9400+ *should* offer superior power efficiency and potentially higher peak performance, but real-world thermal management will be crucial. The X8s’s CPU architecture, with more X4 cores, suggests a focus on sustained multi-core performance. The S24 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM and optimized software are likely to provide a smooth experience, but the X8s could potentially outperform it in CPU-intensive workloads.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra achieves an impressive 13:49h of active use, demonstrating excellent battery life. The Oppo Find X8s, however, compensates for a potentially smaller battery with significantly faster charging: 80W wired, 50W wireless, compared to the S24 Ultra’s 45W wired and 15W wireless. The X8s can reach 65% charge in just 30 minutes with its wired charging, a substantial advantage. While the S24 Ultra’s battery endurance is strong, the X8s’s charging speed could mitigate any capacity differences, offering a more convenient experience for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8s if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and value incredibly fast charging speeds. You’ll also appreciate a potentially more aggressive price point. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a refined, feature-rich experience with a proven camera system, exceptional battery life, and the long-term software support of One UI.