Oppo Find X8 vs vivo X100 Pro: A Deep Dive into Mediatek's Flagship Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a brighter display, the Oppo Find X8 emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, offers a slight edge in CPU performance and efficiency, while the 1364 nits display provides excellent visibility. However, the vivo X100 Pro remains a strong contender, particularly for camera enthusiasts.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 24 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 30 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 157.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.20 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 (Global), 2.0 (China), OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, UFCS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5630 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Star Grey, Space Black, Shell Pink, Blue | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | CPH2651, PKB110 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | $ 948.56 / ₹ 74,990 | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X8
- Potentially better sustained performance due to 3nm Dimensity 9400
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed with the Cortex-X925 core
- Reverse wireless charging capability
- Lower peak display brightness compared to the vivo X100 Pro
- Slower wired charging speed (80W vs 100W)
vivo X100 Pro
- Brighter display for improved outdoor visibility
- Faster wired charging (100W) for quicker top-ups
- Likely superior camera system based on brand reputation
- 4nm Dimensity 9300 may exhibit more thermal throttling under sustained load
- No reverse wireless charging
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching 1472 nits compared to the Oppo Find X8’s 1364 nits. This difference translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the X100 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage for outdoor users. However, without PWM frequency data, it’s difficult to assess potential flicker-related eye strain; the Find X8’s panel may be preferable for sensitive users. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is expected to be excellent on both devices given their flagship status.
Camera Comparison
The context data highlights the vivo X100 Pro’s focus on camera capabilities, simply stating 'Photo / Video'. While specific sensor details are missing, vivo’s history suggests a strong emphasis on image processing and potentially larger sensor sizes. The Oppo Find X8’s camera specs are absent, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the competitive landscape, it’s reasonable to expect a high-quality main sensor with OIS on both devices. We can safely assume both will offer a versatile camera system, but the X100 Pro likely holds an edge due to vivo’s established camera expertise.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Oppo Find X8 utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3nm) with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, alongside three Cortex-X4 cores at 3.3 GHz and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.4 GHz. The vivo X100 Pro features the Dimensity 9300 (4nm) with a Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.25 GHz, three more Cortex-X4 cores at 2.85 GHz, and four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 3nm fabrication process of the 9400 should yield better power efficiency and potentially higher sustained performance, mitigating thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The X8’s faster prime core also suggests a slight advantage in single-core tasks. Both devices utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the specific speed isn’t specified, making a direct comparison impossible.
Battery Life
Both phones deliver remarkably similar battery life, with the Oppo Find X8 achieving 13:58 hours of active use and the vivo X100 Pro managing 13:53 hours. This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The X100 Pro supports 100W wired charging (50% in 14 minutes), while the Find X8 offers 80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, and UFCS. The X100 Pro’s faster charging is a clear convenience advantage. Both support 50W wireless charging, and the Find X8 adds 10W reverse wireless charging, a feature absent from the X100 Pro’s specifications.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 if you need uncompromising CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing or emulation, and value a display that excels in bright outdoor conditions. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prioritize camera capabilities and fast charging, and appreciate a slightly larger, brighter screen, even if it comes at a minor performance trade-off.