Oppo Find X8 vs. vivo iQOO 12 Pro: A Flagship Face-Off Between Mediatek and Qualcomm

The Oppo Find X8 and vivo iQOO 12 Pro represent the cutting edge of Android flagship technology, but they take distinctly different approaches. The Find X8 champions Mediatek’s latest Dimensity 9400 chipset, while the iQOO 12 Pro relies on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and charging capabilities to determine which device reigns supreme.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and rapid charging, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, coupled with 120W charging, offers a more consistently powerful experience. However, the Oppo Find X8’s Dimensity 9400 and excellent display brightness make it a compelling alternative.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Find X8 vivo iQOO 12 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, October 242023, November 07
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, October 30Available. Released 2023, November 14
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame-
Dimensions157.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.20 x 2.93 x 0.31 in)164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight193 g (6.81 oz)205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 7i-
Resolution1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density)
Size6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak)LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G925Adreno 750
OSAndroid 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanoramaHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS
Sound
35mm jackNoNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 55.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 3.0 (Global), 2.0 (China), OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, UFCS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless
TypeSi/C Li-Ion 5630 mAh5100 mAh
Misc
ColorsStar Grey, Space Black, Shell Pink, BlueBlack, Red, White (BMW M branding)
ModelsCPH2651, PKB110V2329A
Price$ 948.56 / ₹ 74,990About 650 EUR

Oppo Find X8

  • Brighter display for outdoor use
  • Potentially better thermal efficiency with 3nm Dimensity 9400
  • Excellent battery life (13:58h active use)

  • Slower wired charging (80W)
  • Dimensity 9400’s real-world performance needs independent verification

vivo iQOO 12 Pro

  • Faster 120W wired charging
  • Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
  • Mature software optimization

  • Likely lower peak display brightness
  • Battery life may be slightly less than the Oppo Find X8

Display Comparison

The Oppo Find X8 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1364 nits, providing exceptional visibility in direct sunlight. While the iQOO 12 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be competitive, but the Find X8 holds a clear advantage in measured brightness. Both devices likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery life. The Find X8’s brightness advantage will be particularly noticeable for users who frequently use their phones outdoors or in brightly lit environments.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both brands are known for delivering high-quality camera experiences. The iQOO 12 Pro, given vivo’s camera heritage, likely prioritizes vibrant colors and strong low-light performance. The Oppo Find X8, leveraging its image processing algorithms, may lean towards a more natural look. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS capabilities prevents a definitive assessment, but both phones will likely feature capable main sensors.

Performance

The core of the battle lies in the chipsets. The iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a well-established performer, known for its raw power and efficiency. The Oppo Find X8’s Dimensity 9400 (3nm) aims to leapfrog Qualcomm with a more advanced manufacturing process. The Dimensity 9400’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, and 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720 – suggests a focus on peak performance, while the iQOO 12 Pro’s 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720, 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 configuration offers a more balanced approach. The 3nm process of the Dimensity 9400 *should* translate to better thermal efficiency, but real-world testing is crucial to confirm this. The iQOO 12 Pro benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations and a mature software ecosystem.

Battery Life

The Oppo Find X8 achieves an impressive 13:58h active use score, demonstrating excellent battery life. The iQOO 12 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but its 120W wired charging significantly surpasses the Find X8’s 80W. This means the iQOO 12 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. Both phones offer 50W wireless charging and 10W reverse wireless charging. The iQOO 12 Pro’s charging speed is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Find X8 if you prioritize a brighter display for outdoor visibility and are intrigued by Mediatek’s latest CPU architecture. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you demand the fastest possible charging speeds, consistently high frame rates in gaming, and a proven track record of thermal management with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Dimensity 9400 in the Oppo Find X8 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9400’s 3nm process *should* mitigate overheating, but sustained performance under heavy load requires thorough testing. Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 has a proven track record of thermal management, giving the iQOO 12 Pro a slight advantage in this area. Real-world benchmarks will reveal the true thermal capabilities of the Find X8.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the iQOO 12 Pro compared to the 80W charging on the Oppo Find X8?
The 120W charging on the iQOO 12 Pro will significantly reduce charging times. While exact figures depend on battery capacity, expect a 0-100% charge in approximately 25-30 minutes, compared to 35-45 minutes for the Oppo Find X8’s 80W charging. This difference is substantial for users who prioritize quick top-ups.
❓ Does the Oppo Find X8 support high refresh rate gaming?
While not explicitly stated, the Dimensity 9400 chipset is capable of supporting high refresh rate gaming. The Find X8 likely features a display with a 120Hz or higher refresh rate, enabling smoother gameplay. However, sustained high frame rates will depend on the game’s optimization and the phone’s thermal management.