Oppo Find X8 vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-around excellence and a mature software experience, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra remains the safer bet. However, the Oppo Find X8’s Dimensity 9400 offers a compelling performance advantage, particularly for those seeking raw processing power and faster charging, making it a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 24 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 30 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 157.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.20 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 (Global), 2.0 (China), OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, UFCS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5630 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Star Grey, Space Black, Shell Pink, Blue | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | CPH2651, PKB110 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | $ 948.56 / ₹ 74,990 | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X8
- Significantly faster 80W wired charging
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- 3nm chipset offers potential efficiency gains
- Camera details are currently unknown
- ColorOS may not appeal to all users
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Refined software experience with One UI
- Versatile and well-regarded camera system
- Strong ecosystem integration with Samsung devices
- Slower 45W wired charging
- Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) may trail Dimensity 9400 in raw CPU power
Display Comparison
Both devices boast exceptional displays, but the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra edges ahead with a measured peak brightness of 1447 nits compared to the Oppo Find X8’s 1364 nits. This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, Samsung’s display benefits from its established calibration expertise, potentially offering more accurate color reproduction. The S24 Ultra’s slightly larger screen size and potentially narrower bezels contribute to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
While detailed camera analysis requires sample images, the context data highlights a key difference: the S24 Ultra explicitly mentions photo/video capabilities, suggesting a more comprehensive and refined camera experience. The larger sensor size, typically found in Samsung’s Ultra models, combined with advanced image processing algorithms, likely delivers superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The Oppo Find X8’s camera specs are currently unknown, but it will need to deliver exceptional performance to compete with Samsung’s established camera prowess. The absence of detail regarding the Find X8’s camera suggests it may not be a primary differentiator.
Performance
The core of this comparison lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X8’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, fabricated on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core clocked at 3.63 GHz, suggesting a focus on single-core performance. This contrasts with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s (4nm) Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.39 GHz. The Dimensity 9400’s architecture, with more X4 cores, could translate to superior multi-core performance. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and extensive developer support. The S24 Ultra’s LPDDR5x RAM complements the Snapdragon, while the Find X8’s RAM specification is currently unknown, potentially impacting overall system responsiveness.
Battery Life
Battery life is remarkably close, with the Oppo Find X8 achieving 13:58 hours of active use versus the Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 13:49 hours. This suggests efficient power management on both sides. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Find X8’s 80W wired charging, alongside 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless, significantly outperforms the S24 Ultra’s 45W wired, 15W wireless, and 4.5W reverse wireless. The Find X8 can likely achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes, while the S24 Ultra takes considerably longer. This makes the Find X8 the clear winner for users who prioritize rapid charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 if you prioritize peak CPU performance, exceptionally fast 80W wired charging, and are comfortable with Oppo’s ColorOS. This phone is ideal for demanding users who frequently engage in resource-intensive tasks like video editing or heavy multitasking. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you value a refined software experience, a versatile camera system with extensive features, and the broader ecosystem benefits of the Samsung brand. It’s the better choice for users who want a polished, reliable flagship experience with strong resale value.