Oppo Find X8 vs Honor Magic6 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance and Battery Life
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Magic6 Pro emerges as the slightly stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a proven track record of stability and efficiency, coupled with a significantly brighter display. While the Find X8’s Dimensity 9400 promises raw power, the Magic6 Pro’s refined package provides a more consistently excellent experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 | Honor Magic6 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 24 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 30 | Available. Released 2024, January 18 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame | Glass front (NanoCrystal Shield), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 157.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.20 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.5 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 225 g or 229 g (7.94 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | NanoCrystal Shield |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1280 x 2800 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 112.8 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.4-2.0, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF, OIS 180 MP, f/2.6, (periscope telephoto), 1/1.49", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS, 2.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS, HDR, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/2.93", 0.6µm, AF TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 (Global), 2.0 (China), OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, UFCS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 80W wired 66W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5630 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Star Grey, Space Black, Shell Pink, Blue | Black, Green, Blue, Purple, White |
| Models | CPH2651, PKB110 | BVL-AN16, BVL-N49 |
| Price | $ 948.56 / ₹ 74,990 | € 455.54 / $ 899.00 / £ 598.99 |
Oppo Find X8
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- UFCS charging support (future-proofing)
- Faster wireless charging than some competitors
- Dimensity 9400’s thermal performance is unproven
- Slightly shorter battery life in active use tests
- Lower peak display brightness
Honor Magic6 Pro
- Proven Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance and efficiency
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Longer battery life in real-world testing
- 4nm process is less advanced than Dimensity 9400’s 3nm
- Wireless charging is slower than Oppo Find X8
- Lacks UFCS charging support
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic6 Pro boasts a substantial advantage in display brightness, reaching a measured 1578 nits compared to the Oppo Find X8’s 1364 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (though not explicitly stated), the Magic6 Pro’s higher peak brightness is a clear win. We expect both to offer excellent color accuracy, but the Honor’s panel provides a more comfortable viewing experience in challenging lighting conditions. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, aligning with current flagship trends.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones are expected to feature high-end camera systems. The chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role, and Qualcomm’s ISP in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is renowned for its image processing capabilities. The larger sensor size, if present in the Magic6 Pro, would further enhance low-light performance. We anticipate both phones will offer excellent image quality, but the Snapdragon’s established track record gives the Magic6 Pro a slight edge in image processing consistency and video recording quality.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X8’s Mediatek Dimensity 9400, built on a 3nm process, features a unique CPU configuration with a Cortex-X925 prime core, suggesting a focus on single-core performance. The Honor Magic6 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a Cortex-X4 prime core. While the Dimensity 9400’s X925 *should* offer a performance edge, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from Qualcomm’s extensive optimization and a more mature software ecosystem. The Magic6 Pro’s LPDDR5x RAM, paired with the Snapdragon’s efficiency, likely results in more consistent sustained performance and better thermal management. The Dimensity 9400’s thermal performance will be a key area to watch in long-term testing.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic6 Pro edges out the Oppo Find X8 in real-world battery life, achieving 14:06 hours of active use compared to the Find X8’s 13:58 hours. This difference, while not massive, is significant. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s superior efficiency contributes to this advantage. Both phones offer fast charging: 80W wired for both, but the Magic6 Pro’s 66W wireless charging is faster than the Find X8’s 50W. The Magic6 Pro also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Find X8. The Find X8 compensates with UFCS support, a newer standard, but its practical benefit remains to be seen.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 if you prioritize potentially higher peak CPU performance and are willing to accept a newer chipset with less established real-world testing. This phone is ideal for power users who frequently engage in demanding tasks like video editing or emulation. Buy the Honor Magic6 Pro if you value a proven, efficient chipset, a brighter and more visible display in direct sunlight, and slightly longer battery life. This is the better choice for everyday users, content consumers, and mobile gamers who want a reliable and polished experience.