Oppo Find X8 vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and charging speed, the Oppo Find X8 is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9400 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the Pixel 8 Pro. However, the Pixel 8 Pro remains the superior choice for photography enthusiasts and those deeply invested in the Google ecosystem.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 24 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 30 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), glass back (Gorilla Glass 7i), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 157.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mm (6.20 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1256 x 2760 pixels (~460 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.59 inches, 105.6 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 3840Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G925 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 73mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", 0.61µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS, NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.0 (Global), 2.0 (China), OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 55W, PPS, UFCS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5630 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Star Grey, Space Black, Shell Pink, Blue | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | CPH2651, PKB110 | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | $ 948.56 / ₹ 74,990 | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Oppo Find X8
- Significantly faster charging (80W wired)
- Superior CPU performance with Dimensity 9400
- Longer battery life in active use
- Camera details are unknown, potential software disadvantage
- Less integrated software experience compared to Pixel
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera capabilities and image processing
- Seamless Google software integration and updates
- Bypass charging for improved battery health
- Slower charging speed (30W wired)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Dimensity 9400
- Shorter battery life in active use
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching 1600 nits compared to the Find X8’s 1364 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (not specified in data, but standard for this class), the Pixel’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Find X8’s brightness is still excellent, but the Pixel edges it out for outdoor usability. Color accuracy is likely comparable, given both are flagship devices, but detailed calibration data is unavailable.
Camera Comparison
The context data highlights 'Photo / Video' for the Pixel 8 Pro, indicating a strong emphasis on camera capabilities. While specific sensor details are missing, Google’s computational photography prowess is well-established. The Pixel 8 Pro’s image processing is renowned for its dynamic range and realistic color reproduction. The Find X8’s camera specs are not provided, making a direct sensor comparison impossible. However, given Oppo’s history, it will likely feature a competitive camera system, but may lean towards a more vibrant, processed look. Without detailed sensor information, the Pixel 8 Pro holds the advantage due to Google’s software expertise.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 9400 in the Find X8, built on a 3nm process, is architecturally more advanced than the Google Tensor G3’s 4nm node. The Dimensity 9400’s octa-core configuration (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925, 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) suggests a focus on sustained performance, with the X925 being the latest generation high-performance core. The Tensor G3’s nona-core setup (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3, 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715, 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks. While the Tensor G3 excels in Google’s specific AI workloads, the Dimensity 9400 is expected to deliver superior CPU and GPU performance in general applications and gaming. The Find X8 will likely exhibit less thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X8 demonstrates superior battery endurance with an active use score of 13:58h, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h. This translates to nearly 2.5 hours more real-world usage. The Find X8 also boasts significantly faster charging: 80W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless, versus the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired and 23W wireless. The Pixel 8 Pro’s ‘Bypass charging’ feature, which reduces battery degradation, is a valuable addition, but doesn’t offset the Find X8’s charging speed advantage. The Find X8’s faster charging means less time tethered to an outlet, despite a potentially similar battery capacity (not specified).
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value incredibly fast charging. You'll benefit from the latest chipset technology and a brighter display. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prioritize computational photography, seamless software updates, and a tightly integrated Google experience. Its strengths lie in image processing and AI-driven features.