Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs vivo X100 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and all-day battery life, the Oppo Find X8 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite, coupled with a more efficient power profile, delivers a smoother experience under load and a significantly longer active use duration of 16:20h compared to the vivo X100 Pro’s 13:53h.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 Ultra | vivo X100 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2023, November 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 16 | Available. Released 2023, November 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm or 9.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 221 g or 225 g (7.80 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | - |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, Funtouch 15 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR, 3D LUT import |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.1, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/3.1, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1/.95", 0.8µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/0.98", 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.5, 100mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.51", 0.7µm, PDAF (18cm - ∞), OIS, 4.3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 18W PD, 18W QC, 55W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 100W wired, 50% in 14 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Ion 5400 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Pure White, Shell Pink | Startrail Blue, Asteroid Black, Sunset Orange, White |
| Models | PKJ110, PKU110 | V2324A, V2309 |
| Price | - | ₹ 59,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
- Superior battery life (16:20h active use)
- More efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset
- Potentially better single-core performance with Oryon cores
- Lower peak display brightness
- Camera details are currently unknown
vivo X100 Pro
- Brighter display (1472 nits)
- Strong camera focus (Photo/Video)
- Fast charging (50% in 14 minutes)
- Shorter battery life (13:53h active use)
- Less efficient Dimensity 9300 chipset
Display Comparison
The vivo X100 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 1472 nits, compared to the Oppo Find X8 Ultra’s 1157 nits. This difference is noticeable in direct sunlight, giving the X100 Pro an edge for outdoor visibility. However, both displays likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, conserving battery. While the X8 Ultra’s brightness is lower, Oppo’s color calibration is historically more accurate, potentially offering a more pleasing viewing experience for color-critical work. The lack of detailed panel specs (PWM frequency, color gamut coverage) prevents a complete assessment.
Camera Comparison
The context data highlights the vivo X100 Pro’s focus on camera capabilities, though specific sensor details are missing. The inclusion of 'Photo / Video' suggests a strong emphasis on both aspects. While the X8 Ultra is expected to have a competitive camera system, the X100 Pro likely prioritizes image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor sizes. Without detailed sensor specifications (megapixel count, aperture, OIS), it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, vivo’s history suggests a focus on computational photography, potentially offering advantages in low-light scenarios. The absence of details on the X8 Ultra’s camera system makes a direct comparison challenging.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X8 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (SM8750-AB) utilizes a 3nm process and a unique Oryon V2 Phoenix CPU architecture (2x4.32 GHz + 6x3.53 GHz). This architecture, co-developed with Arm, is designed for peak performance and efficiency. The vivo X100 Pro’s Dimensity 9300 (4nm) employs a different approach with its all-Cortex-X4 prime core configuration (1x3.25 GHz + 3x2.85 GHz + 4x2.0 GHz). While the Dimensity 9300 is powerful, the 4nm process is less efficient than the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm node, potentially leading to more thermal throttling under sustained load. The X8 Ultra’s Oryon cores are expected to deliver superior single-core performance, benefiting responsiveness and app launch times.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X8 Ultra demonstrates a clear advantage in battery life, achieving 16:20h of active use compared to the vivo X100 Pro’s 13:53h. This difference, despite the X100 Pro’s 100W charging (50% in 14 minutes), is likely attributable to the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s superior power efficiency. Both phones offer 100W wired charging, 50W wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging, but the X8 Ultra’s longer runtime minimizes the need to utilize these fast-charging features. The X100 Pro’s faster initial charge is offset by the X8 Ultra’s overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 Ultra if you need uncompromising performance for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and value exceptional battery endurance. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite and optimized power management are ideal for power users. Buy the vivo X100 Pro if you prioritize camera capabilities and a brighter display, and are willing to trade some battery life for those features. The Dimensity 9300 offers strong performance, but the X8 Ultra’s efficiency is a key differentiator.