Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing sustained performance and exceptional battery life, the Oppo Find X8 Ultra emerges as the winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite, coupled with a 16:20 active use score, provides a noticeable advantage. However, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s brighter display and established software ecosystem remain compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2024, January 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 16 | Available. Released 2024, January 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Corning Gorilla Armor), glass back (Corning Gorilla Armor), titanium frame (grade 2) |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 162.3 x 79 x 8.6 mm (6.39 x 3.11 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - INT· Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) - USA· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM - CN |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 232 g or 233 g (8.18 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Armor |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~505 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 113.5 cm2 (~88.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) | Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X, 120Hz, HDR10+, 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | 8-core (1x3.39GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.1GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.9GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.2GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Adreno 750 (1 GHz) |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.1, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/3.1, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1/.95", 0.8µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF | 200 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 10 MP, f/2.4, 67mm (telephoto), 1/3.52", 1.12µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/3.4, 111mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, Super Steady video |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, HDR10+, stereo sound rec., gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, HDR10+ |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | 12 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.2", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 18W PD, 18W QC, 55W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 45W wired, PD3.0, 65% in 30 min 15W wireless (Qi) 4.5W reverse wireless |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Pure White, Shell Pink | Titanium Black, Titanium Gray, Titanium Violet, Titanium Yellow, Titanium Blue, Titanium Green, Titanium Orange |
| Models | PKJ110, PKU110 | SM-S928B, SM-S928B/DS, SM-S928U, SM-S928U1, SM-S928W, SM-S928N, SM-S9280, SM-S928E, SM-S928E/DS |
| Price | - | $ 514.94 / C$ 929.99 / £ 630.00 / € 658.53 / ₹ 84,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.26 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.30 W/kg (body) |
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
- Exceptional battery life (16:20h active use)
- Faster charging speeds (100W wired, 50W wireless)
- Potentially superior CPU performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Camera specs currently unknown
- Software ecosystem less mature than Samsung
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
- Brighter display (1447 nits)
- Mature software experience with long-term updates
- Versatile and well-regarded camera system
- Shorter battery life (13:49h active use)
- Slower charging speeds (45W wired, 15W wireless)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1447 nits compared to the Oppo Find X8 Ultra’s 1157 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight, giving the S24 Ultra a clear advantage for outdoor use. While both likely employ LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, the S24 Ultra’s higher peak brightness and potentially superior color calibration (based on Samsung’s history) make it the more visually impactful display. We expect both to have excellent color accuracy, but the Samsung has the edge in sheer luminance.
Camera Comparison
The context data for the Oppo Find X8 Ultra lacks specific camera details, but given Oppo’s recent focus, we anticipate a strong emphasis on computational photography and potentially a large main sensor. The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s camera system is well-documented, offering versatile photo and video capabilities. While sensor size and OIS are crucial, the S24 Ultra’s advantage lies in its refined image processing algorithms and extensive software features. Without detailed specs for the Oppo, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison, but Samsung’s established camera prowess gives it a lead.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find X8 Ultra utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This contrasts with the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) and its Cortex-X4 prime core at 3.39 GHz. The 3nm process of the Snapdragon 8 Elite *should* offer better power efficiency and thermal headroom, potentially leading to less throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Oryon cores are also known for their strong single-core performance, which benefits responsiveness in everyday tasks. However, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 benefits from Qualcomm’s continued optimization and wider software support.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X8 Ultra delivers a remarkable 16:20h of active use, significantly outperforming the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra’s 13:49h. This difference is substantial and highlights the efficiency gains of the Snapdragon 8 Elite and potentially a more optimized software experience. The Oppo also boasts significantly faster charging with 100W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless, compared to the Samsung’s 45W wired, 15W wireless, and 4.5W reverse wireless. The Oppo’s charging speed allows for a full charge in a fraction of the time, a crucial benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 Ultra if you need maximum battery endurance for power users, prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks like video editing, and value cutting-edge charging technology. Buy the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra if you prefer a brighter display for outdoor visibility, a more mature and feature-rich software experience with longer update commitments, and a well-established camera system with extensive software features.