Oppo Find X8 Ultra vs Google Pixel 8 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance, gaming, and incredibly fast charging, the Oppo Find X8 Ultra is the clear winner. However, the Google Pixel 8 Pro excels in computational photography, software experience, and offers a more refined, AI-powered user experience, making it ideal for photography enthusiasts and Google ecosystem devotees.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X8 Ultra | Google Pixel 8 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - G1MNW |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 83, 84 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - G1MNW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 10 | 2023, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April 16 | Available. Released 2023, October 12 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.1 x 76.8 x 8.8 mm (6.42 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 162.6 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.40 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 226 g (7.97 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass (unspecified version) | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1440 x 3168 pixels (~510 ppi density) | 1344 x 2992 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~489 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.82 inches, 113.0 cm2 (~90.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~87.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak) | LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 2400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) | Nona-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 & 4x2.45 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) | Google Tensor G3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 830 | Immortalis-G715s MC10 |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Hasselblad Color Calibration, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Multi-zone Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Ultra-HDR, panorama, Best Take, Zoom Enhance |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.1, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 3x optical zoom, multi-directional PDAF (10cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/3.1, 135mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1/.95", 0.8µm, 6x optical zoom, dual pixel PDAF (35cm - ∞), OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.75", 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/2.8, 113mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.0, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video, Dolby Vision | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | 10.5 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, thermometer (skin temperature) |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 100W wired, 18W PD, 18W QC, 55W PPS 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 30W wired, PD3.0, PPS, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless Bypass charging |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6100 mAh | Li-Ion 5050 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Matte Black, Pure White, Shell Pink | Obsidian, Porcelain, Bay, Mint |
| Models | PKJ110, PKU110 | GC3VE, G1MNW |
| Price | - | € 362.00 / $ 289.97 / £ 329.95 / ₹ 54,999 |
Oppo Find X8 Ultra
- Blazing-fast 100W charging
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 8 Elite
- Longer battery life in active use
- Display brightness lower than Pixel 8 Pro
- Camera specs currently unknown
Google Pixel 8 Pro
- Exceptional camera with AI-powered features
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Seamless software experience and long-term support
- Slower charging speeds
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Elite
Display Comparison
The Pixel 8 Pro boasts a brighter display at 1600 nits peak brightness compared to the Find X8 Ultra’s 1157 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates (though not explicitly stated for the Oppo), the Pixel’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. The Find X8 Ultra’s display specs don’t indicate any standout features beyond brightness, suggesting a focus on efficiency rather than pushing display boundaries. Color accuracy is likely excellent on both, given their flagship status, but the Pixel’s brightness gives it an edge for outdoor use.
Camera Comparison
While the Pixel 8 Pro is known for its camera prowess, the context data lacks specifics beyond 'Photo / Video'. However, Google’s computational photography is a major strength, leveraging AI for features like Magic Eraser and Best Take. The Find X8 Ultra’s camera specs are absent, making a direct sensor comparison impossible. Given Oppo’s history, it’s likely to feature a high-resolution main sensor, but the Pixel’s software processing is a significant differentiator. The Pixel’s video capabilities are also highly regarded, benefiting from Google’s advanced stabilization and dynamic range algorithms. Without more details on the Find X8 Ultra’s camera system, the Pixel 8 Pro holds the advantage based on brand reputation and known software capabilities.
Performance
The Oppo Find X8 Ultra’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz, is a powerhouse. This architecture, combined with the 3nm process, promises significant performance and efficiency gains over the Google Pixel 8 Pro’s Google Tensor G3 (4nm). The Tensor G3’s nona-core CPU, while utilizing Cortex-X3 and A715 cores, is architecturally less aggressive. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is expected to deliver superior sustained performance, particularly in graphically intensive tasks, and will likely exhibit less thermal throttling. The Find X8 Ultra is the clear choice for gamers and power users.
Battery Life
The Oppo Find X8 Ultra demonstrates a significant advantage in battery endurance with a 16:20h active use score, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 11:14h. While the Pixel 8 Pro’s older endurance rating of 90h provides some context, real-world active use is more relevant. The Find X8 Ultra also boasts significantly faster charging with 100W wired, 50W wireless, and 10W reverse wireless, compared to the Pixel 8 Pro’s 30W wired, 23W wireless, and reverse wireless. The Find X8 Ultra can likely achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes, while the Pixel 8 Pro takes closer to an hour. The Find X8 Ultra’s charging speed and longer battery life are compelling advantages.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X8 Ultra if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and value the convenience of 100W wired and 50W wireless charging. Buy the Google Pixel 8 Pro if you prefer a seamless software experience, prioritize exceptional camera capabilities with Google’s AI enhancements, and appreciate long-term software support.