Oppo Find X6 vs vivo X90 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Flagship Android Power

The Oppo Find X6 and vivo X90 Pro+ represent the pinnacle of Android smartphone engineering, both aiming for a premium experience. However, they diverge in core component choices – the Find X6 utilizes MediaTek’s Dimensity 9200, while the X90 Pro+ champions Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. This comparison dissects these differences, revealing which phone delivers the best performance, camera capabilities, and overall value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the vivo X90 Pro+ emerges as the superior choice. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 offers a demonstrable performance and efficiency advantage over the Dimensity 9200, translating to smoother gaming and potentially longer battery life. While the Find X6 is a strong contender, the X90 Pro+’s chipset and faster charging give it the edge.

PHONES
Phone Names Oppo Find X6 vivo X90 Pro+
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 661, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66
5G bands1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE-A, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 CDMA2000 1x CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2023, March 212022, November 22
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, March 24Available. Released 2022, December 06
Body
Build-Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back
Dimensions162.9 x 74.1 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.92 x 0.35 in)164.4 x 75.3 x 9.7 mm (6.47 x 2.96 x 0.38 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMDual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by)
Weight207 g (7.30 oz)221 g (7.80 oz)
 IP64 dustproof and water splashproofIP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionUnspecified-
Resolution1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density)1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~517 ppi density)
Size6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~90.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak)LTPO4 AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm)
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC11Adreno 740
OSAndroid 13, ColorOS 13.1Android 13, Funtouch (Global), Origin OS 3 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM
 UFS 4.0UFS 4.0
Main Camera
FeaturesHasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panoramaZeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, Dual Pixel PDAF, Laser AF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.5, 90mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, AF
Single-32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 112˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF-
Video4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, 14-bit RAW video
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanoramaHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30/60fps
Sound
3.5mm jack NoNo
35mm jackNo-
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 -32-bit/192kHz audio
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
Infrared portYesYes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a++B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5)GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 3.2, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum
Battery
Charging80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min80W wired, 100% in 33 min (advertised) 50W wireless Reverse wired
TypeLi-Po 4800 mAhLi-Po 4700 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsBlack, Green, GoldBlack, Red
ModelsPGFM10V2227A
PriceAbout 760 EURAbout 1030 EUR

Oppo Find X6

  • Potentially lower price point
  • MediaTek Dimensity 9200 offers strong performance
  • Fast 80W wired charging

  • Dimensity 9200 may throttle under sustained load
  • Lacks wireless charging and reverse charging

vivo X90 Pro+

  • Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 delivers superior performance and efficiency
  • 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging
  • Faster full charge time (33 minutes)

  • Likely higher price tag
  • Snapdragon chipsets can sometimes run warmer than Dimensity

Display Comparison

While both devices likely feature high-quality AMOLED panels, specific details like peak brightness and color calibration are missing. However, the underlying chipset impacts display responsiveness. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s Adreno 740 GPU is a more powerful graphics processor, potentially enabling smoother animations and higher frame rates in graphically intensive applications. Both phones will likely offer excellent viewing experiences, but the X90 Pro+ has the headroom for more demanding visual tasks.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands are known for their camera prowess. The X90 Pro+’s Snapdragon ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally regarded as superior for image processing, offering faster processing speeds and potentially better dynamic range. The X90 Pro+ is likely to have a more advanced image processing pipeline, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Find X6 will likely excel, but the X90 Pro+ has a clear advantage in computational photography.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) in the vivo X90 Pro+ boasts a slightly higher peak CPU clock speed (3.2 GHz vs 3.05 GHz) and a more refined CPU core configuration, including two Cortex-A715 cores and two Cortex-A710 cores, compared to the Find X6’s three Cortex-A715 and four Cortex-A510 setup. This, combined with the 4nm process node, translates to better sustained performance and thermal management. The X90 Pro+ is expected to exhibit less throttling during prolonged gaming sessions. The X90 Pro+ also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimizations for gaming and AI tasks.

Battery Life

Both phones feature 80W wired charging, but the vivo X90 Pro+ advertises a full charge in 33 minutes, while the Find X6 takes 12 minutes to reach 50%. This suggests a more efficient charging implementation in the X90 Pro+. Furthermore, the X90 Pro+ adds 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, features absent in the Find X6. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s superior efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery in the X90 Pro+, resulting in comparable or even better real-world battery life.

Buying Guide

Buy the Oppo Find X6 if you prioritize a potentially more affordable price point and are comfortable with MediaTek’s Dimensity platform. It’s a solid flagship experience, but requires accepting some performance trade-offs. Buy the vivo X90 Pro+ if you demand the absolute best performance, especially for gaming, and value faster charging speeds and the proven stability of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. It’s the choice for power users and mobile gamers.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 9200 in the Oppo Find X6 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9200 is a powerful chip, but it's known to generate more heat than the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 under sustained load. While Oppo likely implements cooling solutions, users may experience some throttling during prolonged gaming, potentially leading to reduced frame rates.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between the two phones in real-world use?
While both offer 80W wired charging, the X90 Pro+'s advertised 33-minute full charge is noticeably faster than the Find X6's 50% charge in 12 minutes. This translates to less time tethered to a charger, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Is the 50W wireless charging on the vivo X90 Pro+ worth the convenience?
For users who regularly utilize wireless charging, the 50W speed is a significant advantage. It's considerably faster than many other wireless charging implementations, making it a practical and convenient charging option.
❓ Will I notice a difference in app loading times and overall smoothness between the two phones?
Yes, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in the X90 Pro+ offers a performance edge, resulting in faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience, particularly in demanding applications and games.