Oppo Find X6 vs vivo X90 Pro: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 Pro edges out the Oppo Find X6 thanks to its significantly faster 120W wired charging and robust 50W wireless charging. While both offer excellent performance and cameras, vivo's charging speed and reverse wired charging provide a noticeable advantage for many users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X6 | vivo X90 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 21 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, December 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame, eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.1 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 74.5 x 9.3 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 214.9 g (7.58 oz) |
| IP64 dustproof and water splashproof | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | - |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, Funtouch 14 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 112˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50.3 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.6, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.4", 0.7µm, AF, 2x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 108˚ 16mm (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a++B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min 50W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 4870 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Legendary Black, Red |
| Models | PGFM10 | V2242A, V2219 |
| Price | About 760 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 96h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1228735 (v9) GeekBench: 4273 (v5.1) GFXBench: 74fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X6
- Potentially more competitive pricing
- Refined design
- Excellent display
- Versatile camera system (expected)
- Slower charging speed (80W)
- Lacks wireless charging
- No reverse wired charging
vivo X90 Pro
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- 50W wireless charging
- Reverse wired charging
- Excellent battery life (96h endurance)
- High peak brightness (934 nits)
- Potentially higher price
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with vibrant colors and smooth refresh rates. The vivo X90 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 934 nits, offering slightly better outdoor visibility. The 'infinite' contrast ratio mentioned for the vivo X90 Pro is a nominal value, but suggests deep blacks and excellent image quality. The Oppo Find X6 likely has a slightly more refined color calibration, but the difference is minimal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature impressive camera setups, but with different strengths. The vivo X90 Pro is known for its excellent image processing and natural-looking photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Oppo Find X6 is expected to offer a more versatile camera system with potentially better zoom capabilities. Detailed camera comparisons require extensive testing, but both are expected to excel.
Performance
Powered by the same Mediatek Dimensity 9200 chipset and CPU configuration, both phones deliver flagship-level performance. Expect seamless multitasking, smooth gaming, and effortless handling of demanding applications. Real-world performance differences will likely be negligible.
Battery Life
The vivo X90 Pro claims an impressive endurance rating of 96 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Oppo Find X6's battery capacity is likely comparable, but the vivo X90 Pro's 120W wired charging (vs. Oppo's 80W) provides a significant advantage in charging speed. The vivo X90 Pro also offers 50W wireless charging and reverse wired charging, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Find X6 is ideal for users prioritizing a balanced experience with a focus on a refined design and potentially a slightly more competitive price. The vivo X90 Pro is best suited for power users who demand the fastest charging speeds, wireless charging capabilities, and appreciate a premium camera experience.