Oppo Find X6 vs vivo X90: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo X90 takes a slight edge thanks to its significantly faster 120W charging and potentially superior camera processing. However, the Oppo Find X6 might offer a more refined overall experience and potentially better software support. It's a close call, depending on your priorities.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X6 | vivo X90 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 21 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March 24 | Available. Released 2022, November 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 162.9 x 74.1 x 9 mm (6.41 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 74.4 x 8.5 mm or 8.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 196 g / 200 g (6.91 oz) |
| IP64 dustproof and water splashproof | IP64 dust/water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Unspecified | - |
| Resolution | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~452 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.5 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Immortalis-G715 MC11 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), OriginOS 3 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB UFS 3.1 - 128GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, Pixel Shift, dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 65mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, 2.8x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 112˚, (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.0, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.93", 1.22µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a++B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD, 50% in 12 min | 120W wired, 50% in 8 min Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | 4810 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Gold | Asteroid Black, Breeze Blue, Red |
| Models | PGFM10 | V2241A |
| Price | About 760 EUR | About 300 EUR |
Oppo Find X6
- Potentially better software support
- Slightly brighter display (rumored)
- Balanced overall experience
- Premium design
- Slower charging speed
- Camera processing might be less vibrant
vivo X90
- Blazing-fast 120W charging
- Potentially superior camera processing
- Vibrant and pleasing images
- Reverse wired charging
- Software support potentially less extensive
- Design might be less distinctive
Display Comparison
Both phones feature excellent AMOLED displays with high refresh rates (likely 120Hz). The Oppo Find X6 is rumored to have a slightly brighter display, but both offer vibrant colors and excellent viewing angles. Expect similar performance in everyday use and media consumption.
Camera Comparison
The vivo X90 is expected to have a more advanced camera system, potentially leveraging vivo's image processing expertise. While both phones likely feature high-resolution main sensors, the vivo X90's image processing might produce more vibrant and immediately appealing photos. The Oppo Find X6 may offer more natural color reproduction.
Performance
Both devices are powered by the same Mediatek Dimensity 9200 chipset, ensuring flagship-level performance. Expect smooth multitasking, responsive gaming, and effortless handling of demanding applications. Real-world performance differences will likely be minimal.
Battery Life
The vivo X90's 120W charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Oppo Find X6's 80W charging is still fast, but significantly slower. Battery capacity is likely similar, but the vivo X90's charging speed gives it a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
The Oppo Find X6 is ideal for users prioritizing a balanced experience with a focus on software and potentially longer-term support. The vivo X90 is perfect for those who value blazing-fast charging and a camera system known for its vibrant and pleasing images, even if it means potentially less software customization.