Xiaomi 13 Pro vs Oppo Find X5: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Android Phones
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi 13 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset delivers significantly improved performance and efficiency, complemented by a brighter display and faster charging. While the Find X5 remains a solid option, the 13 Pro offers a more future-proof experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Oppo Find X5 | Xiaomi 13 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 - Global | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 24 | 2022, December 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 14 | Available. Released 2022, December 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back or silicone polymer back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 160.3 x 72.6 x 8.7 mm (6.31 x 2.86 x 0.34 in) | 162.9 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 210 g or 229 g (7.41 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~522 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.73 inches, 108.9 cm2 (~89.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1900 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55 | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 - 128GB UFS 4.0 - 256/512GB | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Hasselblad Color Calibration, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Leica lens, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, 52mm (telephoto), 1/3.4", 2x optical zoom, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 110˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF | 50.3 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1.0"-type, 1.6µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 75mm (telephoto), PDAF (10cm - ∞), 3.2x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS; HDR, 10‑bit video | 8K@24fps (HDR), 4K@24/30/60fps (HDR10+, 10-bit Dolby Vision HDR, 10-bit LOG), 1080p@30/120/240/960fps, 1080p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, PD 30W wireless 10W reverse wireless | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min 50W wireless, 100% in 36 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4800 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Purple | Ceramic White, Ceramic Black, Ceramic Flora Green, Mountain Blue |
| Models | PFFM10, CPH2307 | 2210132G, 2210132C |
| Price | $ 950.00 / £ 218.30 / € 339.00 | About 750 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 108h | Endurance rating 115h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.3 LUFS (Good) | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 810715 (v9) GeekBench: 3331 (v5.1) GFXBench: 59fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 1281666 (v9) GeekBench: 5087 (v5.1), 5323 (v6) GFXBench: 64fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Oppo Find X5
- Potentially lower price point (due to age)
- Refined design aesthetic
- Solid overall performance for everyday tasks
- Older Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Slower charging speeds
- Less bright display
Xiaomi 13 Pro
- Latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset
- Significantly faster charging (120W wired)
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient power consumption
- Higher price tag
- Larger size and weight (typical of Pro models)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1253 nits compared to the Oppo Find X5’s 807 nits. This translates to vastly improved visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels, but the Xiaomi’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. While both likely employ high refresh rate panels (not specified in the data, but standard for this class), the Xiaomi’s superior brightness makes it the better choice for outdoor use and HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are equipped with capable camera systems, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro likely holds an edge due to its newer image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. While the data doesn’t specify sensor sizes, Xiaomi’s flagship phones typically prioritize large sensors for improved low-light performance. The Oppo Find X5’s camera is still capable, but the Xiaomi 13 Pro’s processing and potentially larger sensor will likely deliver more detailed and dynamic images. The data doesn't provide enough information to compare specific camera features beyond 'Photo/Video' capabilities.
Performance
The core difference here lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Oppo Find X5’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm). The Gen 2 features a newer CPU architecture (Cortex-X3 vs X1) and a more efficient manufacturing process. This results in faster processing speeds – 3.2 GHz peak vs 2.84 GHz – and improved thermal management. The Xiaomi 13 Pro will handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing with greater ease and less throttling. The newer CPU cores (A715/A710 vs A78/A55) also contribute to better overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13 Pro and Oppo Find X5 both achieve an endurance rating of 115 hours, but the way they get there differs significantly. The Xiaomi 13 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is more power-efficient, allowing it to achieve a 10:55h active use score. The Oppo Find X5 has an endurance rating of 108h. Crucially, the Xiaomi 13 Pro supports 120W wired charging, capable of fully charging the device in just 19 minutes, a massive improvement over the Oppo Find X5’s 80W charging. The Xiaomi also offers faster wireless charging at 50W compared to the Oppo’s 30W.
Buying Guide
Buy the Oppo Find X5 if you prioritize a refined design and can find it at a significantly discounted price. It's a good option for users who don't demand the absolute latest performance or camera capabilities. Buy the Xiaomi 13 Pro if you want the best possible Android experience, with top-tier performance, a stunning display, and incredibly fast charging – and are willing to pay a premium for it.